|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 874
Likes: 275
Liked 1,349 Times in 412 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I look at all the bogus numbers that are in the books on these combinations other than this one. I summit the correct ones to the numbers and it is screwing up the whole platform I think. The stock pin, stock ring, journal sizes. I'm so over this I can't tell you. They questioned the piston from Diamond because it had 2mm rings. Yup! So Chrysler was suppose to send the spec sheet to probably Jeff Connelly. Whether that happened. I'm over it. The excepted crankshaft after I called is a stroked crank to make it a 426. I called Pat. He said it should have been put in there. Probably still there. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 1,197
Liked 1,955 Times in 492 Posts
|
![]()
So on the pistons, will Diamond not etch "NHRA" in the piston without acceptance even though they followed spec? Also it need to be said I'm certainly no expert I'm following along here too.
__________________
Todd Greene |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 919
Likes: 1,143
Liked 693 Times in 205 Posts
|
![]()
Paul, PM sent.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 874
Likes: 275
Liked 1,349 Times in 412 Posts
|
![]()
Yahoo!! The piston is in the books this morning. Very happy!!
Paul Haszlauer 7019 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 874
Likes: 275
Liked 1,349 Times in 412 Posts
|
![]()
I received a E-Mail this morning to apologize for my bad mouthing message that started this thread. Sorry to hear I hurt feelings. I hope everyone can heal now. By the way thanks for all the "Liked" Since I was in the Hospital
two weeks ago. It made me feel better. Thanks a bunch, Paul Haszlauer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|