|
|
|
|
08-07-2021, 07:17 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker
What wheel offset do I need to properly fit a 15x10 with a 9x30 radial in the rear? I'm looking at some of the black versions of the RC Components "Fusion" wheels...
|
|
|
|
08-07-2021, 11:01 AM
|
#2 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker
Quote:
SS are a few mm longer. No problem fitting 30x9 slicks. I have rare Centerlines wheels with 3.5 backspacing. Wagons have even longer axle. I do have a complete 8.5 rear for sale. 4.56, Moser axles, ARP studs, mini spool. disk brake to disk brake. Have a PowerTrak in box. |
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2021, 11:37 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker
My bad- I was reading the wrong line when I scrolled right to see the pounds per horsepower.
It is in fact 14.87 pounds per horsepower for the '94-'96 Chevy and Buick LT1 B-wagons, making them natural N cars, which would save me the expense of a roll bar and 2-year driver's harness. I'm gonna go back and edit my previous posts, to eliminate the incorrect information. Last edited by 6130; 08-07-2021 at 02:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
08-07-2021, 11:45 AM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
|
Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker
Okay, so the N/SA index is 13.00, and the record is currently 11.99 @108 or so. Sounds like I'm looking at about a 5.57 rear gear for starters...
Last edited by 6130; 08-07-2021 at 11:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
08-07-2021, 03:16 PM
|
#5 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 2,155
Liked 2,336 Times in 549 Posts
|
Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
08-07-2021, 03:43 PM
|
#6 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,669
Likes: 3,359
Liked 1,804 Times in 422 Posts
|
Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker
Billy Nees. I have one of these wagons in stock.
Hmmm. Winter project?
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK |
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
08-07-2021, 03:56 PM
|
#7 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker
Az Classic car site on facebook has a 92 Chevy Wagon, running driving with lt1 for 2800. Car looks pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2021, 04:13 PM
|
#8 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker
Quote:
Running 28inch tire, locking converter at 98mph. If I go with a 8inch converter will go to a 30 inch tire. Turn off the lock up. N/SA you will be close to 4500lbs. |
|
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
08-07-2021, 04:27 PM
|
#9 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,809
Likes: 2,900
Liked 5,113 Times in 1,948 Posts
|
Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker
Sounds like you're doing your homework..That's good.
Just be careful who you listen to..This won't be a pure stocker. OD trans planetaries and clutches and LU converters have no business in a good K/SA car. You'll leave too much ET on the table. I think you already know that. ;-)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
|
|
| Liked |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
