|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for that. I only have rule books thru 1968, when you couldn't in general "adjust" the car weight like you can today. Are you saying the weight could be "adjusted" in 1969? I tried that link but my Norton says its a known dangerous link so I didn't want to go there. Not that Norton is always right. If you have time to look at my last post on pg1 see what you think of it - everything seems to make sense if the glass fenders were allowed which it seems they were. I think what i read was that for 1965-up CARS, they had to be all steel (except the hood) so that's why Mopar did the A990 in all steel. I just wondered why the T-bolts all disappeared in 1965-66-67-68 but I think I got it on my page 1 post here. I'd sure like to get that 1969 Rule book. I will send you a PM EDIT: Well PM doesnt seem to work, maybe it's my setup or Norton or something. In any case I got the 69 rule book from that HAMB link so thanks. Last edited by DeuceCoupe; 09-30-2021 at 08:57 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 224
Likes: 94
Liked 437 Times in 169 Posts
|
![]()
1968, 1969 and 1970.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fife, Washington
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 2,579
Liked 3,015 Times in 721 Posts
|
![]()
Since this thread is about Thunderbolts, I have a 2 part question about them.
I am not trying to derail this thread just need some questions answered. 1. When introduced in 1964 was the Thunderbolt S/S only? 2. If S/S only then, how are they in Stock Eliminator currently? Or am I way off on this??? Not trying to through anyone under the bus, just curious. Yea, I know curiosity killed the cat. Just so you know, I love Ford Thunderbolts and have a book all about them by Charles R. Morris. I also love 68 Hemi Darts and Barracudas, too.
__________________
Ron McDowell - Did Race Every day is a Gift - Enjoy with family and friends. Last edited by Carguy49; 09-29-2021 at 02:07 PM. Reason: more info. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 237 Times in 126 Posts
|
![]()
Found a link to 58-69 rule books on HAMB (Hokey *** Message Board) conmanly known as JalopyJournal.com.
https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/...resent.870742/ I have the pdf for 1969 and will send it by PM to anyone who can't make the link or download work. EDIT: Wikipedia T-Bolt page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Fairlane_Thunderbolt Ron- A National Dragster Featured Flyer will answer those questions. https://www.nhra.com/news/2016/featu...ck-thunderbolt Hemming.com on the Thunderbolt https://www.hemmings.com/stories/art...bolt-1964-ford
__________________
Dale Shearon 68 Mustang 6394 Last edited by FireSale; 09-29-2021 at 04:26 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Western PA
Posts: 459
Likes: 13
Liked 287 Times in 146 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
2. A number of years back, NHRA started allowing limited production cars in Stock. '67 R0/W0 Mopars, '64/'65 Hemi cars, etc. The '68 L0/B0 A-bodies and the '67 L-88 Corvettes are still not allowed though. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fife, Washington
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 2,579
Liked 3,015 Times in 721 Posts
|
![]()
Thank you Dale for the post with links to articles. I was kinda looking for more definite answers, but the articles are great.
Steve thanks for the answers, just adds to the NHRA confusion on how cars are allowed. Some have been and some still not allowed. Oh well. Just so you know, I was positive the Thunderbolts were S/S only before some being made into A/FXer's. A wild time for sure. I was a pre driving teen at that time.
__________________
Ron McDowell - Did Race Every day is a Gift - Enjoy with family and friends. Last edited by Carguy49; 09-30-2021 at 11:16 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Carlisle OH
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 4
Liked 493 Times in 231 Posts
|
![]()
The Thunderbolts seem like a complicated car/combo
__________________
Jake Biermann |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Bay City Texas
Posts: 390
Likes: 2
Liked 226 Times in 137 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]()
Back regarding the original question in the thread:
It looks like the 64 T-Bolt became legal to run in SS/ as of 1968 (Before then it was banned due to being lighter than the 8 lb/CID rule) But in 1968 it would've had to go up against the 68 Hemi Dart/Cuda. So, nobody ran it. But for 1969, it seems that was the year the 427 HiRiser was factored down to 450hp from its previous 490-500hp factoring. That put the 64 T-Bolt at 3206/450=7.12, right near the top of SS/D=7.00 class. And voila, there's a T-Bolt or two (the picture of the Ulrey car, and Tom Marsh as R/U in SS/D=7.00 class). Now, the question: If the 427HR was factored down to 450hp, that puts the 64 LWG LightWeight Galaxie at 3749/450=8.33 Way down in SS/F=8.00 class, running against flat-hood single-quad Fairlane 427MR's. Sure the LWG is almost 400 lb heavier, but it also has a HiRiser and cold air thru the grille. Seems it would have been competitive just like the de-factored T-Bolt. Anybody hear of a 64 LWG running in SS/F=8.00 in 1969? Of course for 1970 both cars got the boot from SS/ due to being more than 5 years old, and at least back then couldn't run in Junior Stock. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|