|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,732 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Somehow, the Mopar heads are being treated as if the aluminum head is a different combo from the OEM head with it's own HP factor. Not the +10 HP over the OEM head that NHRA originally assigned.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 27
Likes: 5
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Billy- What happens when the "aftermarket heads" get the HP hit? Does it effect the "stock head" HP Factor too? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,732 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
IMHO, if the aftermarket head (carrying a +10 factor) gets a HP hit then yes, it should affect the stock head. The point of my side of this conversation is that whatever the "stock head" HP factor is, the "aftermarket head" factor should be +10! These "aftermarket" heads were not handed out to be of any advantage other than that of access to the Racer. If the Racer chooses to take advantage of the ease of access provided by the "aftermarket" head then the Racer should be willing to accept the +10 HP/weight penalty.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K Last edited by Billy Nees; 02-07-2022 at 01:08 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 79
Likes: 32
Liked 497 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
Aluminum or replacement heads - Some received a 10 hp adjustment and others 5. On our 318 combo we petitioned NHRA for the 5 hp like our Chevy bros recd and we got it. Noticed some bb chevy also recd 10. Not sure the thinking with NHRA. Typo?
All the engine gurus i talk to say the aluminum head loses 15 hp apples to apples. I'm thinking untouched that is probably correct but with the better combustion chambers etc who knows. So if an aluminum is untouched there could be a hp reduction under the then current factored rating. I know our 340 aluminum ss cant compare to the steel head factor. +17 hp difference on aluminum, not 10 or 5. Last edited by Mike Volkman; 02-07-2022 at 04:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,596
Liked 7,732 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Maybe they (NHRA) could use their recently enacted Rescission policy!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 231
Likes: 35
Liked 478 Times in 91 Posts
|
![]()
What class factor is required for a combo to be obsoleted from Stock Eliminator?
I understand that 7.50 is the factor for AA....but can the combo be any amount under 7.50 and still be allowed to run AA? Or what is the lowest threshold class factor still allowed in stock? Is a 6.95 class factor allowed to run in AA still?
__________________
Austin Williams 3 SG 464Q STK SC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 871
Likes: 270
Liked 1,344 Times in 410 Posts
|
![]()
Not sure I'm on the right subject here. Check out the 71 440 6bbl Roadrunner. It can run A/SA. AA/SA with a Hemi. It is also a natural E/SA with a 340. Some weight got trimmed off that car. Cool makes a new combination in lighter trim.
Paul |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jersey
Posts: 371
Likes: 43
Liked 98 Times in 23 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dave Ficacci 1013 STK 1170 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 27
Likes: 5
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
How about the stock heads make one natural class but the aftermarket headed combos change the natural class. Oh and add in the combos that give you 2 carb options and 2 different hp factors then add in aftermarket heads! 6 different combos out of one original combo! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,640
Likes: 1,937
Liked 10,713 Times in 2,230 Posts
|
![]()
Dave I don’t think the 427/445 69 Camaro can run AA/SA with the shipping weight of 3096. Divide 3096 by 445= 6.96 p/w. The natural imaginary class is two class below the 7.50 to 7.99 weight break. Adding 222.5 lbs to the shipping weight of 3096 would be 3318.5 lbs. Divide 3318.5 by 445hp = 7.457 p/w, the car would still not be in 7.50 to 7.99 window.
I believe class cars can move up or down one class from the natural class provided there’s a class for it to fit in. That’s how I read the rule book, I could be wrong. Uncle Al was wise beyond his years. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|