|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Italy, Texas
Posts: 176
Likes: 374
Liked 66 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Any body ever look into building a 95 Grand Am with the V-6. 201 cubic inches and a pretty good size throttle body, .409 lift cam, fairly good compression, 15.15 index, seems like it wouldn't be too hard to get that thing under the index. Rated at 150 hp and around 2700 pounds.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,758 Times in 1,741 Posts
|
![]()
It should probably run pretty good. The 60* V6 has been done before (right Yac?). I don't know what transaxle you would use (125?) and I'm not sure what 4 speed transaxle came in it. It's an OBD1 car so you would probably wind up putting in an aftermarket ECU to tune it but there are some older ones popping up used.
You're off on your weight because NHRA did away with the 17.5 lb. class so you would wind up in BF at 2650 (doubtful) or the new CF at 3115. I know that there's an older Grand Am running around D1 that's real fast but I think it's a Buick motor.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: hamburg ny
Posts: 41
Likes: 258
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
I recently seen a local guy racing a basically all stock 97 camaro with a lt1 auto combo, from what he tells me it has some suspension upgrades which he bought all used and he paid 1500 for the car because a blow head gasket. Not the fastest but consistent, and definitely under 5 grand the only weak point on the car is the rearend he says.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 506
Likes: 1,040
Liked 998 Times in 276 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
if so very impressive.
__________________
Duane Hoven 1342 SS/GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: hamburg ny
Posts: 41
Likes: 258
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,817
Likes: 2,907
Liked 5,125 Times in 1,953 Posts
|
![]()
Sounds like a cheap Sportsman Bracket car to me..(12.0 and slower)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: hamburg ny
Posts: 41
Likes: 258
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,817
Likes: 2,907
Liked 5,125 Times in 1,953 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Actually it's .430 lift in FWD...Comp has the blanks and can make you one with street and strip lobes @ .430 lift. Original duration is about 196 @ .050. Now, if you want to go fast, it will take some serious hands on fabrication. Earlier non-electric T 440 should bolt in. 3 speed 125 requires fabbed mounts and a custom right hand axle shaft. Same 245 mm converter, either way. Log type manifolds are junk. Real headers will take another serious hands- on effort. Now you'll end up with a fair amount of torque in a FWD car. The car will need a major weight re-distribution to make it consistent. I would seriously think about a slower class V 8 or V6 2 bbl. car, instead of this one. (PS..it's rated at 155 hp) ![]()
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 03-09-2022 at 01:04 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Italy, Texas
Posts: 176
Likes: 374
Liked 66 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
It's sitting in my yard so I was just looking at it. Probably should've done that one instead of the IROC I did.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Italy, Texas
Posts: 176
Likes: 374
Liked 66 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Mark, do you think those primaries are long enough?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|