HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-08-2022, 03:31 PM   #1
CMcAllister
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fulton County, PA
Posts: 623
Likes: 17
Liked 930 Times in 264 Posts
Default Re: RPM Act Hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby DiDomenico View Post
Sadly this may all be a losing battle with pr like this':
EPA Hits Two More Diesel Tuners With $10 Million Fine For Defeat Devices
https://www.yahoo.com/now/epa-hits-t...160400802.html
$10,000,000 fine (civil penalties) for breaking a rule no elected legislators voted on, no one proposed in a bill. Just make it up, and dare them to come fight the government.
CMcAllister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 08:42 PM   #2
MR DERBY CITY
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,665
Likes: 1,095
Liked 8,226 Times in 1,538 Posts
Default Re: RPM Act Hearing

It’s difficult to win a battle against IDIOTS . California for instance , record heat wave pushes power grid to the brink…..yet these IDIOTS insist on ELECTRIC VEHICLES and are banning the sale of new gas powered vehicles by 2035. How is that gonna work out ???

Last edited by MR DERBY CITY; 09-08-2022 at 08:45 PM.
MR DERBY CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 08:43 PM   #3
Don Sofranko
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Liked 128 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: RPM Act Hearing

Well I did a quick search and found the SEMA site pretty informing.
In making sense of this, the small guy will probably never get chased down by the EPA, even if the act doesn't get passed. No custom built drag car is going to be fined, no custom off road racing engines are going to be targeted, and the off road stuff is unlikely to get banned.

On the street it could be different.
There are some pretty obnoxious diesel guys on the street, that could get some quick attention.
Common sense would tell me the EPA can't enforce local cases of a cheat device installation on a subtle tuned car here and there. I have yet to see an EPA car with red lights stopping anyone, maybe they are out there?
Can the police possibly be trained nationwide to nab a single car? Doesn't sound possible to me.

But if Larry Larson pulls out of the drag week gate with a big turbo Pro-Line engine, in a new Caddy, while acting like its really a street car, with a VIN and title, well he would be pretty game. Still they are not going to be able to police single cases, and prefer to stop the selling of defeat devices, mostly for diesels.

The SEMA argument
https://www.sema.org/epa-news

The clean air act has been around since 1963. In 2015 the EPA took the position that converted vehicles must remain emissions-compliant, even though they are no longer driven on public streets or highways. Although the EPA abandoned efforts to make the policy a formal regulation, the agency still maintains the practice of modifying the emission system of a motor vehicle for the purpose of converting it for racing is illegal. Manufacturing, selling, and installing race parts for the converted vehicle would also be a violation.

===========

The other side of the argument, this site says the bill has come up, every year, the last 4-5 years.
Its a very good read, and has good info on the tug of war.
Its complicated so read before blaming one party or person (below are exerts - not my words):

https://blog.ucsusa.org/dave-cooke/t...-ruin-our-air/

EPA enforcement under the Clean Air Act has found that about 1 in every 10 diesel trucks has had their emissions controls tampered with.
and
Why the RPM Act keeps coming back
As with most tiny, obscure bills like this, the reason why the RPM Act keeps on being introduced year after year is money. The Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) is the trade association for aftermarket equipment manufacturers, including the companies manufacturing defeat devices, and they have been fighting with EPA for the exemption for at least 5 years.

On the left (SCCA corvette) is what SEMA wants you to think the RPM Act is about. However, less than 5 percent of EPA tampering actions have been for anything related to cars, and there is no evidence of EPA targeting the amateur racing industry. On the right (obnoxious diesel) is what SEMA is actually protecting with the RPM Act by shifting the burden of enforcement from the product to the use of that product.

Last edited by Don Sofranko; 09-08-2022 at 09:00 PM.
Don Sofranko is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 09-08-2022, 09:16 PM   #4
Don Sofranko
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Liked 128 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: RPM Act Hearing

So that last site I mentioned, showed an ebay example of something targeted.
A diesel particulate filter defeat tuning device kit.

I went and looked for H & S MiniMAXX tuner sales on ebay, and other sites.
Are these devices still legal?
I would say the EPA is working on them as indicated by other people who have been fined before.
Don Sofranko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 09:43 PM   #5
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 2,199
Liked 2,364 Times in 560 Posts
Default Re: RPM Act Hearing

If the EPA doesn't have their eyes on us, then why the 2015 wording?

The gentleman from the EPA at the hearing never said that they would consider converted VIN numbered cars as exempt. He just said that they were yet to go after them.

To my knowledge, the RPM Act would not protect any street driven vehicle. As a PRI Founding Member I have been in a couple of conversations about this.

If the EPA was on our side, they wouldn't be fighting the PRI....
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams
NHRA Stock/SS 2007
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2022, 10:19 PM   #6
SSGT Mustang
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jersey
Posts: 359
Likes: 35
Liked 204 Times in 54 Posts
Default Re: RPM Act Hearing

We can be as polite as we want but that won't stop the madness. Livestock is a target for crying out loud. They want to decide what we can eat because, you know, carbon. I guess nobody explained that carbon is EVERYWHERE.

People who believe what the government says are the same people who can be sold the Brooklyn bridge by a NYC panhandler.

How can you defeat what's already been pushed way too far with no end in sight?
SSGT Mustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2022, 02:35 PM   #7
CMcAllister
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fulton County, PA
Posts: 623
Likes: 17
Liked 930 Times in 264 Posts
Default Re: RPM Act Hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Sofranko View Post
Well I did a quick search and found the SEMA site pretty informing.
In making sense of this, the small guy will probably never get chased down by the EPA, even if the act doesn't get passed. No custom built drag car is going to be fined, no custom off road racing engines are going to be targeted, and the off road stuff is unlikely to get banned.

On the street it could be different.
There are some pretty obnoxious diesel guys on the street, that could get some quick attention.
Common sense would tell me the EPA can't enforce local cases of a cheat device installation on a subtle tuned car here and there. I have yet to see an EPA car with red lights stopping anyone, maybe they are out there?
Can the police possibly be trained nationwide to nab a single car? Doesn't sound possible to me.

But if Larry Larson pulls out of the drag week gate with a big turbo Pro-Line engine, in a new Caddy, while acting like its really a street car, with a VIN and title, well he would be pretty game. Still they are not going to be able to police single cases, and prefer to stop the selling of defeat devices, mostly for diesels.

The SEMA argument
https://www.sema.org/epa-news

The clean air act has been around since 1963. In 2015 the EPA took the position that converted vehicles must remain emissions-compliant, even though they are no longer driven on public streets or highways. Although the EPA abandoned efforts to make the policy a formal regulation, the agency still maintains the practice of modifying the emission system of a motor vehicle for the purpose of converting it for racing is illegal. Manufacturing, selling, and installing race parts for the converted vehicle would also be a violation.

===========

The other side of the argument, this site says the bill has come up, every year, the last 4-5 years.
Its a very good read, and has good info on the tug of war.
Its complicated so read before blaming one party or person (below are exerts - not my words):

https://blog.ucsusa.org/dave-cooke/t...-ruin-our-air/

EPA enforcement under the Clean Air Act has found that about 1 in every 10 diesel trucks has had their emissions controls tampered with.
and
Why the RPM Act keeps coming back
As with most tiny, obscure bills like this, the reason why the RPM Act keeps on being introduced year after year is money. The Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) is the trade association for aftermarket equipment manufacturers, including the companies manufacturing defeat devices, and they have been fighting with EPA for the exemption for at least 5 years.

On the left (SCCA corvette) is what SEMA wants you to think the RPM Act is about. However, less than 5 percent of EPA tampering actions have been for anything related to cars, and there is no evidence of EPA targeting the amateur racing industry. On the right (obnoxious diesel) is what SEMA is actually protecting with the RPM Act by shifting the burden of enforcement from the product to the use of that product.
With all due respect, I have learned to never say never when it comes to the government. Especially the alphabet agencies (the 4th branch of government not mentioned in the Constitution), which are essentially who control most of our daily lives now. None of those people need to worry about being re-elected.

Current initiatives and expansion by several of them only serve to re-enforce my misgivings about the whole mess.

That said, we still need to contact our elected representatives and let them know our positions.
CMcAllister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2022, 05:40 AM   #8
Terry Cain
Senior Member
 
Terry Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 779
Likes: 530
Liked 232 Times in 108 Posts
Default Re: RPM Act Hearing

Off topic, maybe.
I worked at an appliance manufacturing plant for 30 years. One of the BIG ones. Not gonna mentions name because it's not really important. This manufacture has it's corp offices in Louisville, KY. and also it's biggest facilities located there.
They use to make water softeners in the USA but it all went to China. I, one day happened to see a water softener in the warehouse. I stopped to look at the box and noticed on the box " A product of XYZ appliance company, Louisville, KY. USA."
Looked everywhere else on box and nothing about made in USA or China or ??
I guess this is legal but it sure is misleading and I'm sure they're not the only company doing it.
__________________
Terry Cain ???? STK
tcain19689585@gmail.com
Terry Cain is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 09-10-2022, 04:21 PM   #9
Robin Lawrence
Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Galesburg IL.
Posts: 178
Likes: 261
Liked 717 Times in 121 Posts
Default Re: RPM Act Hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Sofranko View Post

On the left (SCCA corvette) is what SEMA wants you to think the RPM Act is about. However, less than 5 percent of EPA tampering actions have been for anything related to cars, and there is no evidence of EPA targeting the amateur racing industry. On the right (obnoxious diesel) is what SEMA is actually protecting with the RPM Act by shifting the burden of enforcement from the product to the use of that product.
I disagree, Here is a link on the PRI site about a company selling stand alone ECU's to race cars specifically off road vehicles.

https://www.performanceracing.com/ma...'s%20sales.
__________________
STK 308
SS 3088
Robin Lawrence is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 09-10-2022, 07:33 PM   #10
CMcAllister
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fulton County, PA
Posts: 623
Likes: 17
Liked 930 Times in 264 Posts
Default Re: RPM Act Hearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Lawrence View Post
I disagree, Here is a link on the PRI site about a company selling stand alone ECU's to race cars specifically off road vehicles.

https://www.performanceracing.com/ma...'s%20sales.
Thugs and bullies, engaged in intimidation tactics. Pick on one little guy who looks like easy pickings, make up some crap, destroy his business. How many other little guys are going to fall in line or quit out of fear. Not because they are doing anything wrong.

I may be misinformed, but I understand it is BS like this that was a big part of the decision of the Coughlin family to unload the family business.

They harass people into submission. It's their MO. All of these agencies operate out of the same playbook.
CMcAllister is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.