HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-14-2022, 03:50 PM   #1
herbjr
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 1
Liked 83 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

He may have went to them and said he wanted to re tech and they probably made him pay an entry, I doubt they caught him and let him re enter BUT the truth will be on here later i"m sure
herbjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2022, 03:57 PM   #2
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,643
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,725 Times in 2,233 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

The car in the picture had I/SA on the window. Was the intake the wrong casting number, a 968 or a 301 are the only two listed for the '64 383 or was it a SS intake.
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817

Last edited by Larry Hill; 10-14-2022 at 04:05 PM.
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 12:11 AM   #3
Jared Jordan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 613
Likes: 199
Liked 537 Times in 119 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jared Jordan
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hill View Post
The car in the picture had I/SA on the window. Was the intake the wrong casting number, a 968 or a 301 are the only two listed for the '64 383 or was it a SS intake.
I don’t know which number casting was on it but my understanding is that it was a later-model, stock 383 casting that wasn’t correct for the 64 383.

They’ve run the same car in SS/JA previously with an Edelbrock single plane intake.

I truly believe this was an honest mistake and the driver, when he was told by another racer that he had the incorrect casting on the engine, self-reported himself to NHRA and was permitted to reclassify into SS.
__________________
Jared Jordan
9 B/SA
2024 Jeg's D7 All Star - Stock
Jared Jordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 03:08 PM   #4
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

Is this the new standard for tech? An infraction in Tech or a 1.20 under run, and you get a mulligan? Will this be applied evenly or on a case by case basis? So if I commit a 1.20 under infraction in qualifying so I get to change class or just ask to the tech department to DQ me for the race? So I keep my HP down? Now that there is no 1.20 instant after this year this is a moot point.
Is there any penalties anymore for rule infraction anymore? This is becoming a disturbing trend.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared Jordan View Post
I don’t know which number casting was on it but my understanding is that it was a later-model, stock 383 casting that wasn’t correct for the 64 383.

They’ve run the same car in SS/JA previously with an Edelbrock single plane intake.

I truly believe this was an honest mistake and the driver, when he was told by another racer that he had the incorrect casting on the engine, self-reported himself to NHRA and was permitted to reclassify into SS.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 03:41 PM   #5
Gregg Luneack
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 202
Likes: 9
Liked 225 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

I believe that this was an honest mistake, Joe is
not a full time racer. All of you that are complaining
give him a break, as soon as he was told it was wrong
he reported to NHRA. He was not trying to cheat, he
did not know that manifold was no longer legal.
Why is nobody bitching about the 305 engine that was
never offered in a Camaro but NHRA let it run all year?
Gregg Luneack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 04:35 PM   #6
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

I’m sure he is a good guy and and salt of the earth. If you don’t apply the rules evenly and without prejudice that’s a problem. Do we need a court of
opinion now before any rules are enforced? Who decides on who is a good guy and who is not? Is that the new standard?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregg Luneack View Post
I believe that this was an honest mistake, Joe is
not a full time racer. All of you that are complaining
give him a break, as soon as he was told it was wrong
he reported to NHRA. He was not trying to cheat, he
did not know that manifold was no longer legal.
Why is nobody bitching about the 305 engine that was
never offered in a Camaro but NHRA let it run all year?

Last edited by Todd Hoven; 10-15-2022 at 04:49 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 05:09 PM   #7
duster1256
Junior Member
 
duster1256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 76
Likes: 21
Liked 20 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

Any photos of all the stockers?
duster1256 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 06:29 PM   #8
Joe Schweigert
Member
 
Joe Schweigert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario, calif
Posts: 211
Likes: 61
Liked 19 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregg Luneack View Post
I believe that this was an honest mistake, Joe is
not a full time racer. All of you that are complaining
give him a break, as soon as he was told it was wrong
he reported to NHRA. He was not trying to cheat, he
did not know that manifold was no longer legal.
Why is nobody bitching about the 305 engine that was
never offered in a Camaro but NHRA let it run all year?
Greg ...I'm confused the 305 was the only V8 in the early Gen 3 Camaros at least in California ?
__________________
Joe Schweigert 751 SS
Joe Schweigert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2022, 12:50 PM   #9
442OLDS
VIP Member
 
442OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Schweigert View Post
Greg ...I'm confused the 305 was the only V8 in the early Gen 3 Camaros at least in California ?
I think he meant 350.
442OLDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 01:34 AM   #10
Dave Kommel
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Dimas CA
Posts: 143
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hill View Post
The car in the picture had I/SA on the window. Was the intake the wrong casting number, a 968 or a 301 are the only two listed for the '64 383 or was it a SS intake.
Larry, The photo with I/SA is my photo from Q1. Later it showed SS/JA
__________________
Dave Kommel
Dave Kommel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.