|
|
|
|
10-14-2022, 08:12 PM
|
#1 |
|
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,662
Likes: 1,953
Liked 10,820 Times in 2,249 Posts
|
Re: Divisional at Famoso
GTX that is what the engine specs showed for a 64 383, Today!
|
|
|
|
10-14-2022, 10:52 PM
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 23
Likes: 58
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: Divisional at Famoso
That’s a premeditated blatant cheat. One year off if it was fair. NHRA needs to take a closer look at this.
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
10-14-2022, 11:37 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 359
Likes: 1,444
Liked 566 Times in 135 Posts
|
Re: Divisional at Famoso
This story gets worse the more I think about it.
So I can throw a COPO engine in my 89 Camaro H/SA or a CJ engine in my 92 Mustang K/S (remember there is barely any tech inspection now, correct?), and if I get caught, I can just claim ignorance and say "Sorry, I meant to enter SS in a FGT class????" I sincerely hope there are more details we aren't hearing. |
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
10-15-2022, 11:54 PM
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Liked 65 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: Divisional at Famoso
For those of you that don’t know, this car was driven and owned by his uncle, that passed away,and at that time the Intake was legal. In the last year NHRA decided to remove it from the list, Joe did not know.
|
|
|
|
| Liked |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
