HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-14-2022, 11:48 PM   #1
Nick Heath
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 359
Likes: 1,444
Liked 566 Times in 135 Posts
Default Re: thanks again nhra

I have no horse in this fight, or dog in this race, or whatever the saying is. But I do care enough to ask:

Does NHRA have a coherent, documented process for determining what a combination "platform" is?

From the AHFS page on NHRARacer:

Body platform: Both screening reviews are only in effect for the specific car model being evaluated. The body style is generally classified by the OEM auto manufacturers' definition of "platform", i.e., the Camaro and Firebird body are both based on the same platform and therefore considered the same with regard to body platform classification.

So where exactly does the OEM define a "platform," if their sales brochures etc. are not good enough?

#2, haven't we been arguing about different versions of this "platform" issue for years? Nova vs Camaro, Corvette vs Camaro LS1, FWD Cavalier vs 80s RWD Camaro, etc... I bet we trace everything back to the same root cause: What exactly constitutes a "platform???"
Nick Heath is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.