|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 1
Liked 81 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]()
I was thinking about leaving the transmission cross member in to control the forward and rear movement of the engine. I have seen some cars with a strut mounted to the motor plate also.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 884
Likes: 209
Liked 312 Times in 175 Posts
|
![]()
Add an engine limiter. You can't rely on the crossmember to control the movement.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 42
Liked 183 Times in 48 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The stock mounts are forgiving, whereas tail shaft housings can and do break under heavy load especially when mounted solid to the crossmember.
__________________
SS/BS 1921 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,603 Times in 583 Posts
|
![]()
When I built my former 1994 Mustang Comp Super Modified car, I used the centered engine and mid-plate. As Steve said, not only for header clearance but also because the torsional loads have an effect on the suspension settings and adjustment when the engine is not centered.
For a transmission mount, I used a Polyurethane mount. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|