U/SA

[bigshow2966]

According to DRC Freeman has the Taxi in U this weekend.

[Jack McCarthy]

yac, setting it up wont be like l;ast time 2004 no cic. mj pointed out last night that pats race wasnt an open it was the sportsnats therefore already set up for class eliminations. getting a race to accomodate us without any additional cost might not be a slam dunk.
we laddered off two Q runs, pat had bands paid by beer companies each night, we had our cookout and summerton drowning, hell nitro joe was dancing in the bar first night... this one made towing 900 miles well worth it most fun race ive ever attended and i usually find a good time.

we had $1200 added tueton, my calendar sales, fulper all chucked up a few bucks. autometer, k&n and jegs gave $100 gift cards.

life was good until -004 final

i guess if enough of you slow guys think its a good idea i can try to take care of it .

[Mark Yacavone]

https://www.dragracecentral.com/DRCS...r2004#indextop


Okay then. I'm confused...
Wasn't there a second shootout, when Bob Shaw ran his Seville? He ran in the 12's but didn't end up winning, because it was a CIC race?
Maybe I'm thinking of Beard's deal at Columbus

[Jack McCarthy]

after the first year pat ran a FREE no breakout race on friday night. first year shaw won with the TAXI freemans car i made semis in witch doctor fast guys whined so after that he made it a CIC race from then on ... bob went -217 in caddy in final but took a hit ever round to get there and lost

that clear it up ??

capt

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Jack McCarthy

after the first year pat ran a FREE no breakout race on friday night. first year shaw won with the TAXI freemans car i made semis in witch doctor fast guys whined so after that he made it a CIC race from then on ... bob went -217 in caddy in final but took a hit ever round to get there and lost

that clear it up ??

capt

Okay...Sort of.
So if it happens again, do we want a CIC deal? 1 second under trigger?
Next year @ St Louis would be centrally located at least...Maybe Tyler and co. would accommodate it. With all the racing available, it might be worth it to travel from the outer reaches.
Thoughts , anyone ?

[L.Fite]

So...
How is the 230/140hp L6 as a combo?
In a Camaro.
Looks tough... no compression, 1bbl...
How's parts availability?
Curiosity strikes...

[Doug Hoven]

Originally Posted by L.Fite

So...
How is the 230/140hp L6 as a combo?
In a Camaro.
Looks tough... no compression, 1bbl...
How's parts availability?
Curiosity strikes...

Billy would know better than I would, being that he played with two different cars with that combo for about 20 years. Some parts are easier to find than others. When I ordered a cam 2 years ago, I was told by bullet they had to search far and wide for a cam core for me. Stock connecting rods and crankshaft seems fine for the rpm capability of the motor (lack there of). The intakes and cylinder heads don't exactly fall out of trees, but they are out there. When I rebuilt the engine, it was not a "high dollar" rebuild, but it was all good parts. It's not a bad U/SA car to bracket race, but is more competitive in V/SA. I wouldn't be surprised with enough cash and time it could be a .75-.80 under combo in V. Would be neat to see one built with a third pedal. I was close to doing that, but went the v8 route instead. BTW for those curious, I had a vacuum gauge on the car for a few runs. Pulled about 7-8 in. of vacuum at the top end with that tiny carb. Fun fact the dimensions are the same as one hole of an 850 holley.

[Billy Nees]

Originally Posted by L.Fite

So...How is the 230/140hp L6 as a combo?

It treated me quite well. It would need more HP back to make it a "hitter" in the 21ST Century but it is a good, dependable combo that would probably respond well to a metric or a 4 speed. You can have cams made that will "make" compression (cylinder pressure) but, in the end you're still dealing with a 210 CFM carb..