|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Queens, NYC
Posts: 294
Likes: 234
Liked 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
![]()
Been using Stroud for years, never an issue re-certifying my belts.
__________________
Carl Juliano TS 1275 John Juliano SG 151 Carl Sr. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3,869
Liked 802 Times in 339 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 47
Likes: 20
Liked 43 Times in 18 Posts
|
![]()
Another vote for Pro 1 here. Always super nice and helpful over the phone and recertifies belts quickly!
__________________
Grant Christianson C521 S/G,S/C, S/PRO |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 615
Liked 1,937 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]()
I just buy new. I have been using RJS lately. Seems they all buy the same hardware. Not worth the hassle and cost to ship back and forth plus the cost of recertification
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
Agree harnesses are a disposable item and it’s what I’ve been doing since I purchased my first Simpson harness in 1996. Besides I like new stuff.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 517
Likes: 555
Liked 497 Times in 243 Posts
|
![]()
I always used Simpson.
They used to recertify theirs, but actually what you got was a complete reweb, they only used the hardware. but that was back in the 90s |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3,869
Liked 802 Times in 339 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Probably takes more labor to reweb than to make a new one, but I like the idea of reusing the hardware. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|