|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Western PA
Posts: 455
Likes: 13
Liked 274 Times in 143 Posts
|
![]()
Mark Janaky had said previously that he was not entirely sure that was the correct dealer for the car that is claimed to be the "Balzekas" car.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Canada
Posts: 3
Likes: 3
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
I am inclined to say it was a mistake and they did not get one, just based on the fact of how that in a time when these were limited hard-to-get cars…and Balzekas was a Plymouth dealer not Dodge. Nothing was impossible but based on franchise rules Chrysler certainly wouldnt take a sale away from a Dodge dealer in the zone by giving a Dodge car to a Plymouth dealer (and would be even less likely to do so with a limited and desirable car that many Dodge dealers wanted but couldnt get). Again anything was possible but this would be against protocol and even corporate rules. I cant see Chrysler pulling a risky stunt like that. It would be more appropriate for them to have a B029 Cuda
__________________
Go Mopar Last edited by Jon Mopar; 08-30-2024 at 12:33 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Western PA
Posts: 455
Likes: 13
Liked 274 Times in 143 Posts
|
![]()
I think the Balzekas thing came from one of Paul C's lists...which unfortunately had a lot of errors and have been taken for truth by many.
It's not entirely impossible that a Plymouth dealer raced a Dodge. I know of a Dodge dealer in Ohio who received a new '65 A990 Plymouth. Reason being is that all the Dodges were spoken for, so he was offered a Plymouth. He also campaigned a '67 R0 Plymouth (purchased from another individual when almost new), and a '68 Hemi Road Runner (received on a dealer to dealer trade) later on. There are actually photos of the '65 car lettered with "Dodge" on the doors. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|