|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The number one most obvious and fatal flaw in the AHFS is that some of the softest combinations that have small car counts never get hit despite actually being faster than more popular combinations with a higher car count that do get hit. There is no way to do away with the AHFS with the current make up of Stock and Super Stock, and you sure as Hell don't want to replace it with a bunch of people, because you are not going to find enough honest people representing a broad enough cross section of the classes to give fair representation to everyone. Racing has always been a game, and the really fast guys don't show you what they have on every pass, they never have. Sandbagging will NEVER leave class racing.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
I agree with Alan.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Livermore,Ca
Posts: 334
Likes: 15
Liked 145 Times in 32 Posts
|
![]()
Gene,
We agree 100%!! Mr. Mason, I guess the hours in the garage or the $ weve spent were not in the right place. We do and have raced a long time a psychiatrist or brake specialist might have been a better investment. Mr. Hill, I was done but decided I would share the facts. 3rd rd at a national event when yoiu've been driving fairly well I would think you would give it everything you had, We DID!! Wesley was .002 or 5 and Chad was .031. Sixty foots and 660 were in favor of Chad by 3 hundredths. Damn close in my book so Chad lifted at about 1,100 when Wesley started goin away but mind you goin away was never more than a wheel. Pomona was a mistake and we knew it. We did not expect the car to run that fast and had made several changes that should have kept it from doing so but instead we may have found a few things that we did not expect. To the best of my knowledge these are the facts, if you would like at anytime we could discuss this further. Thank you!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
I have one question? Is there anyone that can not run the index, due to the horsepower hit? You might lose an advantage in class, But these cars can still go fast enough to win an event.
This IS a performance based eliminator. I think the AHFS is a good idea, BUT they should tear cars down for the automatic stuff. And they should altitude correct all runs, including altitude factored tracks. I remember the "GOOD OLD DAYS" when the OUIJA (pronouned WE-GEE) BOARD or the DART BOARD were the main source of the fickle finger of factor.I remember engines getting horsepower when there were 2 or 3 faster combos in the same class. Just because they were'nt politically correct. And I'm not being a crybaby because the combo we ran never got factored. I think you will see more guys quitting because of sandbagging than the economy. What fun is it to run to 1000 ft and shut down or run 300 pounds heavy. This is supossed to be racing not coordinated swimming This is why I'll never go back to a horsepower oriented class. If my index gets hit everyone in the class has to work harder.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I'm not crying either. Neither of our cars got hit. One reason we don't run a 396 is because there are so many of them and they get hit fairly often. One reason those of us who lobbied for the AA classes also asked for a two tenth lower index is to allow the cars to run. NHRA actually asked us what we felt the index should be, and rather than 11.10, we asked for 10.90, the vote was nearly unanimous, I think only one person dissented.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 346
Likes: 19
Liked 20 Times in 15 Posts
|
![]()
I gave up on Stock Eliminator. Well maybe for 2 more years. I checked out a 10K S/SS race in Div. 1.There were a few heavy hitters that were pedaling before the 1000' mark. That's nuts. Her's a solution to the problem. Since we don't get enough qualifying passes how about this. Everyone makes two passes within a 2-3 hour period. You don't get your time. Just like Pinks All Out. Then you get another 2 passes on the clock. Then after tech, eliminations begin. You run faster than your mystery time... your out. Will the supermen of our class be able to defeat this system? Maybe yes. Maybe no.There are two recent winners in S/SS , Mosbeck and Beard that bring home the dream of every S/SS racer that you don't need to run in the top of the class to make it to the finals and win. Every racer that I have spoken to wants to run all out. They do fear refactoring. Refactoring should be done on a yearly basis like before the new season. S/SS is not like Pro Stock. Not everyone is shooting for a 6.67. A 15.80 W/S is pitted against a 9.90 A/SA. The W/S car and driver must be on the money. The combo affords no wiggle room. The A/SA has power advantages but then again his/her budget is much higher. Do the higher class cars always wins? NO. Do the number of cars under "G" at a divisional event out number the higher class cars? Usually YES. How many events no longer pay for a class win. So break the class record. Get your name in ND. Be pround that you picked the right combo or your talented enough to find the extra HP or you died and went to heaven and have all the $ in the world to build a 50K P/SA. Run all out! No pedal racing! No fender racing! Just racing!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
TOO many MOTORS which vary by one cc head spec. one casting number different, one lobe spec. NO ONE will every correct them all to be even with the open books to keep looking.
Want to fix it? Limit motor choices but in any of the car bodies. The smaller the number the easier to control. One 350 chevy 67-72 One set of specs one HP. Too limiting? do you want to fix it? Do you want to run heads up on the gas? It needs to be similar to AH for fairness to all in the classes. All brands though. Factoring should be brand to brand in a class not 15 350 motors with one cc difference or bigger carb or injected. Too radical? maybe but it would help make AHFS simpler. The time of using the books to be fast may be gone for the good of the sport and the attitude of the entire field of racers... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,646
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,745 Times in 2,235 Posts
|
![]()
What's done is history, two very nice runs I might add. We just need to communicate better so this AHFS will have a limitted effect on our combinations. Phone 270 994 4004 Larry
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Instead of killing heads up racing we need to change this system and add something that makes sense. The only thing that the current system does is a "plateau hone" the very top. The trigger method is faulty and needs to be replaced. No cars should be factored because the air is better. We need to stop doing silly things like that. It would be so much easier for NHRA and better for the racers. Lynn 317-839-8378
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS Last edited by Lynn A McCarty; 07-04-2008 at 02:13 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 902 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]()
Lynn McCarty ideas are very sound and makes a lot of sense . Hire Lynn To get the NEW AHFS Headed in the right directions is the way to go >>
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|