|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,605 Times in 583 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Grosse Pointe Woods Mi
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Car is a 71 Chevelle wagon 402ci,natural k/sa.
__________________
Bob Kowal STK 345 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I've heard very good reviews on the Calvert front shock from guys that replaced their old Chassis Engineering or even QA1's. Based on what I have heard, and my budget was $300 or less, I would get the Calvert's. Ideally I would wait until I had enough money for the AFCO's or even Santhuff's.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: houston tx
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The story I get from an NMCA/NMRA chassis builder is that QA1's are prone to leakage and of a lesser build quality than what is ideal. They are however affordable
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Calvert
__________________
Bud Lefevre 3075 STK IHRA World Record Holder |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
|
![]()
I have the QA1 R series single adjustable fronts. They have worked great but it would be ideal to have the double adjustable shocks. They make a huge difference over the inexpensive comp engineering or lakewood style shocks.
__________________
Dusty Lowell #1773 STK F/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|