|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,832 Times in 415 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Id rather see the LT1 Nova accepted rather than the Roush Mustang. They should let the Yenko/Moton/Dana Cars run AA/SA.
__________________
Tony Valerio 1968 Camaro 1700 IHRA H/CM 1701 NHRA SS/?A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,583 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The Roush cars are no more different than the new S/C Shelby Mustang...so, let's also ban them too!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alton, Missouri
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Decal on cover of original folder from Yenko Chevrolet...
__________________
69 Pure/Stock Yenko Camaro 11.73 @ 118 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alton, Missouri
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Original option sheet published by Yenko Chevrolet...funny thing is, aside from the "elaborate decals", the optional hood tach, and the emblems, everything else arrived on the cars from Chevrolet, and was straight regular production stuff...as a matter of fact, the 2 LT-1 Novas that went to Canada were equipped exactly the same as the Yenko Deuces, sans the stripes/emblems, and were sold through regular Chevrolet dealers north of the border...
__________________
69 Pure/Stock Yenko Camaro 11.73 @ 118 Last edited by Chevy454; 09-16-2008 at 10:51 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alton, Missouri
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Letter from Don Yenko to Wally Parks...
__________________
69 Pure/Stock Yenko Camaro 11.73 @ 118 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alton, Missouri
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Another letter from Don Yenko, this time to Bill Dismuke...
__________________
69 Pure/Stock Yenko Camaro 11.73 @ 118 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I guess the issue is Wally probably knew Yenko was lying (as evidenced by this letter). Yenko emphatically states 500 were built. We know for a fact there were only 177 built.
But I'm all for allowing the corporate approved parts and packages. I'm curious, if I looked at the 1970 AMA specifications for the Nova / Chevy II, does it have the LT-1 listed as an option? Because as far as I can tell, back in the day, if an item wasn't listed in the AMA specifications, it just didn't exist as far as NHRA was concerned. Likewise, if an item was listed, it should be as good as gold to NHRA.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX Last edited by Jeff Lee; 09-16-2008 at 12:56 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake Tapps, Washington
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Chevy 454; Please package all of your documentation and send it to me. I will contact GM, provide your info and ask them to apply for the inclusion of the Duece in the SCCG. It must be done this way; (protocal you know.) This sometimes is a slow process but now is a much better time to try than 1970; many things have changed in NHRA regarding this process.
My address is: Dr. Injector Shops Inc. 34703 16th Ave S. Federal Way, Wa. 98003 attn TT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Tony Valerio 1968 Camaro 1700 IHRA H/CM 1701 NHRA SS/?A |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|