What would you do if the NHRA banned timers in .90 (Super) class racing?

Michael Pliska · 10-16-2008, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Glenn

If you complainers get this hing pushed through, (which you won't) What do we do with the 3000-4000 Throttle stops and timers? 1,500,000.00 to 2,000,000.00 in electronics in the recylce bin? Then what will you complain about next? Our shifters? Our delay boxes?

Laughing to hard to continue...

My 2 cents...

Just to clarify - the way I phrased this poll it was not intended to cover throttle stops, only timers. In other words, you would still be able to use your throttle stop, but it would need to be activated either manually or by a shifter which is not timer-based. I just wanted to see how many people like the high-mph racing the way it is today, versus the way it was at the inception of the super categories.

Regards,

View Poll Results: What would you do if the NHRA banned timers in .90 (Super) class racing?
I'd like it and keep racing the current .90 classes. My car isn't high mph anyway.	34	47.89%
I'd like it and keep racing the current .90 classes. I'd sell my 632" and pay off my mortgage.	1	1.41%
I'd grudgingly accept it and race my 160 mph S/ST car in S/C.	0	0%
Do you know how much I spent on this dry sump 632? I'm going Top Sportsman racing!	4	5.63%
I'd hunt down the bastard who proposed it and beat him with the dry sump off of my spare 632.	32	45.07%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode