|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 893
Liked 883 Times in 237 Posts
|
![]()
The AMC 6 is a good choice for a strong bottom end, but choose carefully,carburation is limited to a 1 bbl on most years,with only a few with 2bbl. .....Same for cam lift .....The '77 is the best choice,and has been run sucessfully by several racers,most notably, the infamous Ed F. .....As far as racing a 6 goes, any of them is a challange, ask Billy Nees, by far ,in my opinion,one of the more sucessful 6 cyl Stock racers.....Tom
__________________
Tom Goldman 1500 SG , 1506 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]()
If you have a Fairmont with a 200 then play with it. It's not that bad a combo at 115 hp and it's a 10 cent build except for trans and converter.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewistown, Montana
Posts: 550
Likes: 78
Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Hmmm, the car is REALLY clean and low mileage. I was down to it or Ed suggested a Rambler American, which I also have one of. Guess I have some thinking to do. Thanks so much everyone.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewistown, Montana
Posts: 550
Likes: 78
Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Oh yeah, I don't have a rulebook at hand yet, could anyone maybe tell me what class the Fairmont would fall into? It's a coupe.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,821
Likes: 2,915
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
![]()
I don't see a Fairmont that's any good.
Here's your car : 79 Aspen 2 dr cpe, 225 2bbl @ 140 hp ...V/SA. Easy to build low gearset 904, using the later OD parts Stay in the 6 cyl class...V Case closed.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]()
I have to agree with Mark about the Aspen but don't close the case yet. Mark, he has a clean body to start with. Where are you going to find a decent Aspen? Maybe in your backyard but not in mine. The 200 motor isn't showing the correct factor in the guide. We were looking for a place to play with a Mustang some time ago and got that factor changed to 115 based on a paper mistake. The man to talk to is Dave Ley. At 115 it is a V car and again he has one.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]()
Iraceitall, hang around this board long enough and you'll realize that if you ask 100 S/SS racers a question you'll get 100 different answers. You can pick the best combo, you can pick a combo that you have or you can pick a car for it's emotional attachment. What I'm getting at is to pick a combo that you have the means to finish and have fun with it. As you learn the "ropes" you can make your own decisions.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schomberg, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 1,606
Liked 364 Times in 138 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dave Turner SS/GT #1153 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schomberg, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 1,606
Liked 364 Times in 138 Posts
|
![]()
In another post, you indicated that the Fairmont was an '80. The 200 in that year is 85hp, factored to 140. It's a natural "R" car and I think it would be tough to get that combo to be competetive. You could run at 2690 min. in "R" and would need to make around 180 flywheel hp to run the index(14.35). I don't know if the '80 carb is larger than my '72; the head is considered to be a little better. It has larger intake valves and larger chambers but the pistons are also flat top compared to the earlier dish. Can't tell you much about the runners - yet. Cam lift is the same. My Maverick is almost as light and is a natural "V" package. A second and a half is a bunch between "R" and "V".
My uneducated evaluation.
__________________
Dave Turner SS/GT #1153 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewistown, Montana
Posts: 550
Likes: 78
Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
WOW, this has been an eye opener! Just when I think the Mopar is a goner, here's a good case for it, though I don't have one at the ready, except access to a 78 wagon. When I think more about the Ford, hmm, not so good. The Rambler is still an open case though...
How long did it take you guys to figure out what to build, and why did you build the combos you did, if I may ask? I'm looking for all the insight I can before picking up a wrench... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|