|
|
|
|
12-13-2013, 10:55 AM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 583
Likes: 8
Liked 54 Times in 27 Posts
|
Re: GM Stocker rear end
The rule doesn't save the racers money; 12 bolt, Dana, and 9" cost similar money to build right. Nor does it make the car more "authentic" or "stock" since we see a lot of cars that only had 10 bolts, or 8.75", etc. running the bigger differentials. If it is OK to look under the hood and see a non-authentic aluminum water pump, that is a lot more obvious than a non authentic differential housing.
Oh, sorry, I was interjecting logic and that has little to do with the issue. |
|
|
|
12-13-2013, 11:02 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spotsylvania,Va
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: GM Stocker rear end
If we can get tech involved here may help the case !!
|
|
|
|
|
12-13-2013, 01:08 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 271
Likes: 54
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: GM Stocker rear end
Rule book states - "Distance between backing plates may not be changed."...
Another "Stock Eliminator" rule that is totally ignored anymore... there are lots of "bogus" examples out there if you just pay attention.
__________________
Larry Fulton |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
