HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2010, 01:34 AM   #1
Don Himes
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Port Charlotte, Fla.
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Red face Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

Yeah John, now is the time.......but shouldn't these DP and CJ's be put in their own class? I think F/X makes sense because they are NOT readily available for sale to the general public. That alone should keep them from being classified as a "stocker"! They should run the eliminator but be classed A/FX-B/FX-C/FX-D/FX, etc. I think the factories getting involved is, over-all, a good thing. I'm going to go to bed now and hope I don't have nightmares about a 2011 supercharged Q stocker that can go 11.90's!!!!!!!!
__________________
Don Himes 2075
Don Himes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 06:10 AM   #2
Blingmaster
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

Billy: If this sounds way crazy it is because early morning. If a car is capable of running 1.2+ under why not automatically reclassify to closest up a class say .5 under. Take a G/sa that can run 10.6 put it into a class where 11.0 is index. Better show more side by side racing and room to improve performance. Combo must pass teardown, also how about a red light exemption for drivers over 60.
Blingmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 12:26 PM   #3
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,809
Likes: 2,900
Liked 5,114 Times in 1,948 Posts
Default Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
OK everybody, The -1.40 trigger is taking too long to catch up to all of the "soft" combos out there! Any suggestions? OBTW we're talking Stock and SS!
Billy, 10 pages, 9 & 1/2 o/t, and what do you have?

Reason ?

Nobody cares about U/SA

Wait until the new CJ's and Mopars start running roughshod over everyone in the higher classes.
Bring this thread back then. Watch the response you get.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 12:44 PM   #4
Ron Ortiz
Senior Member
 
Ron Ortiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Englewood, Florida
Posts: 989
Likes: 35
Liked 317 Times in 103 Posts
Default Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

Alan, if they do not go for the "free pass" thats their fault. They are going to get hit regardless. Increments are for the whole track, not just the 1,000' to finish line.

Art, if it is a singles class, it does not matter, no one else is in it either. The AHFS is for heads up runs, it does not matter any other time as it is off your dial .

Ron Ortiz
U/SA free ride
__________________
Ron Ortiz 2102 STK
Ron Ortiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 12:52 PM   #5
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
Default Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Ortiz View Post
Alan, if they do not go for the "free pass" thats their fault. They are going to get hit regardless. Increments are for the whole track, not just the 1,000' to finish line.

Art, if it is a singles class, it does not matter, no one else is in it either. The AHFS is for heads up runs, it does not matter any other time as it is off your dial .

Ron Ortiz
U/SA free ride
Ron, if they don't go for the free pass, there's no data to use to hit them. And the smart racers are not going to go for the free pass.

Forget incrementals. It's not going to happen. They do not like accumulating and compiling the data they do have. They sure won't add to that load.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 01:23 PM   #6
442OLDS
VIP Member
 
442OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 5
Liked 282 Times in 103 Posts
Default Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

I have to agree that it is about time to remove the trigger and see how fast some cars are actually capable of going.
The quality of drivers is better than ever today.If someone can run 1.7 under,and the other car can only run 1.2 under,the faster car will get a decent light and drive the stripe by few hundreths or less.On Drag Race Central,the results "look" like it was a close race,but in reality,it wasn't.
Also,I propose that all HEADS UP RUNS be run on a .400 pro tree,or maybe even an INSTANT green.
442OLDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 12:37 PM   #7
Lynn A McCarty
Member
 
Lynn A McCarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
OK everybody, The -1.40 trigger is taking too long to catch up to all of the "soft" combos out there! Any suggestions? OBTW we're talking Stock and SS!
Billy,

The "trigger" method is invalid. To determine if a combo is bogus, you dont use the fastest run of an individual to compare to the average. The correct way would be to use the average run of a combination to the average standard in SS or S. Not that hard to do and much more accurate.

The second problem is that the corrective action is too small or not often enough. If a car runs 1.4 under firstly you must determine if it is due to outside forces, like AIR? When I say air I am talking about barometer, temperature, and humidity. (I ran on a 100% humidity day at Indy and that was unbelievable)

Fix it? Run a curve of an engine combo and compare those "like" engines to an average. Correct all runs like we do on our weather stations. Then we must increase the correction factor from 4HP to a much larger number.

Mark,

My family knew Marty Robbins very well. He was a great guy. My ex-sister in law was married to his steel guitar player who won best band of the year in the 1982(?) Grammys. I used to go back stage to the Grand Ole Oprey, but since I dont listen to country music I was like a Pontiac guy at a Chevy race! .
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS

Last edited by Lynn A McCarty; 03-29-2009 at 12:47 PM.
Lynn A McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 12:44 PM   #8
Colin Wigle
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty View Post
Billy,

The "trigger" method is invalid. To determine if a combo is bogus, you dont use the fastest run of an individual to compare to the average. The correct way would be to use the average run of a combination to the average standard in SS or S. Not that hard to do and much more accurate.

The second problem is that the corrective action is too small or not often enough. If a car runs 1.4 under firstly you must determine if it is due to outside forces, like AIR? When I say air I am talking about barometer, temperature, and humidity. (I ran on a 100% humidity day at Indy and that was unbelievable)

Fix it? Run a curve of an engine combo and compare those "like" engines to an average. Correct all runs like we do on our weather stations. Then we must increase the correction factor from 4HP to a much larger number.
Very true the correction should bring the 1.4 car to at least the 1.15 triger. with the current system that is not possible.
Colin Wigle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2009, 09:45 AM   #9
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
OK everybody, The -1.40 trigger is taking too long to catch up to all of the "soft" combos out there! Any suggestions? OBTW we're talking Stock and SS!
Billy,
You have a great thread going and gotten a lot of good feedback. Isn't hitting the go-fast guys at -1.30 an attempt to answer your question?

What is the answer that you want to hear?
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2009, 10:03 AM   #10
Jack McCarthy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: lyndon ky. ... louisville area
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 28
Liked 459 Times in 113 Posts
Exclamation Re: We need a new "instant" trigger!

billy, for your information, and you should know better

my car has never been defactored since the 70's when jr stock / superstock were divided NHRA deemed that since when compared to the 1964-1966 283 -220 i have smaller intake, smaller carburetor, more CC's and more deck heigth that the 1957-1961 283 230 hp should be rated 215 ... note that WHOPPING 5 hp for the carb (12hp and the intake now cheating 459 = 17hp >total = 29hp) geez thanks nhra.

i have never asked for or recieved a reduction in horsepower
i have never asked for the 1st or worst redlite rule (and i should)

i just race... and know eventually i'll be rid of the caddy

jack

oh i do manipulate the AFHS... guilty as charged
__________________
Jack McCarthy 3609 STK
"the Captain"
Jack McCarthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.