HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2022, 10:50 AM   #41
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 1,450
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
Default Re: Lets Root Cause the Detriment of Class Racing

Join the show and voice your suggestions. I will send you a link to join. Tuesday at Noon EDT.

__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com
Bobby Fazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2022, 11:57 AM   #42
SBillinson
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 42
Liked 183 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Lets Root Cause the Detriment of Class Racing

There's beauty in simplicity.

For super stock.

1. Twelve classes. Weight per HP. 5-6, 6-7, 7-8, 8-9, 9-10,10-11, 11-12, 12-13, 13-14, SS/AS, SS/BS, SS/CS
2. Eliminations based on index. No dials.
3. Weight break for automatics.
4. Weight break for pre-80's cars.
5. Weight break for non-FWD conversions.
6. Adjust HP up and down until parity established, including FSS.

For those who say that It'll push people away, my answer would be why bother competing in a performance based class if you want to bracket race?

My car's about 0.7 under in good air. I drive a Ford. With a 20-year old engine. In Modified.

I'm working on my combination one part at a time. I have no intention of running out and buying $12K cylinder heads when I haven't even figured out what my existing combination wants. I would gladly take the losses in the proposal above until I can compete with cars at the top of the class.
__________________
SS/BS 1921
SBillinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 08:55 AM   #43
Mike Volkman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 79
Likes: 32
Liked 497 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: Lets Root Cause the Detriment of Class Racing

Spoke to NHRA California. They have no plans to abandon tear downs on 1.20 under runs or random selections as they deem necessary. Their goal is to support class racing. Volkman
Mike Volkman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 09:01 AM   #44
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,777 Times in 1,742 Posts
Default Re: Lets Root Cause the Detriment of Class Racing

Quote:
Originally Posted by SDS Inc View Post
Their goal is to support class racing.
Well THAT'S GREAT! A little thin on details though.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 10-11-2022, 09:15 AM   #45
Mike Volkman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 79
Likes: 32
Liked 497 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: Lets Root Cause the Detriment of Class Racing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Well THAT'S GREAT! A little thin on details though.
Billy - did you not have your morning coffee yet

What were you looking for? I'm thinking same as what they have been doing with the 1.20 and then spot checking - both that have been done this year. They even have been looking at grids etc in sc and sg

Last edited by Mike Volkman; 10-11-2022 at 09:17 AM.
Mike Volkman is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 10-11-2022, 09:20 AM   #46
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,777 Times in 1,742 Posts
Default Re: Lets Root Cause the Detriment of Class Racing

Hey, no offense to you, it's just always the same old drone.
There have been many different suggestions and ideas tossed around on this thread alone and we get crickets.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 09:24 AM   #47
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,777 Times in 1,742 Posts
Default Re: Lets Root Cause the Detriment of Class Racing

Quote:
Originally Posted by SDS Inc View Post
They even have been looking at grids etc in sc and sg
That's a start! When are they going to start looking at grids and data loggers in S/SS? It's about time to start "collecting" ignition boxes and tachometers too.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 10-11-2022, 09:27 AM   #48
Mike Pearson
VIP Member
 
Mike Pearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 615
Liked 1,937 Times in 582 Posts
Default Re: Lets Root Cause the Detriment of Class Racing

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBillinson View Post
There's beauty in simplicity.

For super stock.

1. Twelve classes. Weight per HP. 5-6, 6-7, 7-8, 8-9, 9-10,10-11, 11-12, 12-13, 13-14, SS/AS, SS/BS, SS/CS
2. Eliminations based on index. No dials.
3. Weight break for automatics.
4. Weight break for pre-80's cars.
5. Weight break for non-FWD conversions.
6. Adjust HP up and down until parity established, including FSS.

For those who say that It'll push people away, my answer would be why bother competing in a performance based class if you want to bracket race?

My car's about 0.7 under in good air. I drive a Ford. With a 20-year old engine. In Modified.

I'm working on my combination one part at a time. I have no intention of running out and buying $12K cylinder heads when I haven't even figured out what my existing combination wants. I would gladly take the losses in the proposal above until I can compete with cars at the top of the class.
That would pretty much kill the class. The HP adjustments would come way too slow and would never keep up. The faster and under factored combos would rule. I cant imagine you would keep going to races if you have absolutely no chance to win. Not everyone in Stock and Super Stock is a millionaire and can spend big bucks to race.
Participation is still good right now despite the high fuel cost. Look at St Louis last weekend. big car count. Most nationals reach their quotas very quickly and there is always racers on here begging to get an entry to nationals. Most divisionals are pretty well attended if scheduled properly. I am not seeing much wrong with our classes right now. Hurting the guys at the bottom half of the Q sheet is not the way to grow the classes.

Personally I think the modified cars should be running in comp but I would never push for that change.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS
Mike Pearson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 12:05 PM   #49
B Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 849
Likes: 980
Liked 2,336 Times in 464 Posts
Default Re: Lets Root Cause the Detriment of Class Racing

All the new AHFS has done was make it easier to go as fast as you want to and still have the rest of the year to get your average down. I still have a problem when people talk about all these combo's that are underrated as if there are hundreds of them. I just looked at Indy. It has a pretty good representation of different combo's. In Stock out of the 151 cars how many are underrated ? BP
B Parker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2022, 12:38 PM   #50
SBillinson
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 42
Liked 183 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Lets Root Cause the Detriment of Class Racing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Pearson View Post
That would pretty much kill the class. The HP adjustments would come way too slow and would never keep up. The faster and under factored combos would rule. I cant imagine you would keep going to races if you have absolutely no chance to win. Not everyone in Stock and Super Stock is a millionaire and can spend big bucks to race.
Participation is still good right now despite the high fuel cost. Look at St Louis last weekend. big car count. Most nationals reach their quotas very quickly and there is always racers on here begging to get an entry to nationals. Most divisionals are pretty well attended if scheduled properly. I am not seeing much wrong with our classes right now. Hurting the guys at the bottom half of the Q sheet is not the way to grow the classes.

Personally I think the modified cars should be running in comp but I would never push for that change.
It's a proposal to make the class more competitive. It's not the only proposal. There are way too many classes and not enough performance-based competition. Performance is confined to class eliminations and the occasional heads-up run.

The current situation is akin to the "everyone gets a trophy" mentality. I need to work hard on my combination and not just throw money at it. There are lots of guys going way fast who don't have all the bells and whistles seen on the cars in the millionaire's club.

I agree that Modified should be taken out of SS. The only reason I included it is they're already part of the class and not enough of them to run on their own. Given the present state of the class, it would be hard to justify taking them out unless NHRA also took out FSS, GT and FWD conversions. That would really kill the class.
__________________
SS/BS 1921

Last edited by SBillinson; 10-11-2022 at 12:42 PM.
SBillinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.