HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2011, 09:01 AM   #61
BBF67
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

Be ready for Stock to be revamped in 2012. Look for the upper classes in Stock to be moved to S/S. That's my prediction.
BBF67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2011, 09:10 AM   #62
Bob Pagano
VIP Member
 
Bob Pagano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 241
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBF67 View Post
Be ready for Stock to be revamped in 2012. Look for the upper classes in Stock to be moved to S/S. That's my prediction.
If they do that they will really have a low car counts, some people with high class stockers have their cars for sale now or have already sold them.
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA
Bob Pagano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2011, 10:23 AM   #63
Richard Grant
Member
 
Richard Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Monroe, La.
Posts: 301
Likes: 9
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

Yes, it makes a big difference. When they are allowed traction control, trans brakes(not yet but I'm just waiting), automatic shift, bigger tires(it's coming) and anything the factories and some very smart racers can imagine. The faster cars already have the advantage, that's why Biondo, the Emmons, Fletcher(until he couldn't outrun the factory cars), etc. have gone to high class cars. Any futher rule changes just makes Stock more of a Super Stock class. Sooner than you think NHRA will say why not just combine the classes, look there's really no difference between the two. Everyday the water is getting hotter.
__________________
Richard Grant 4988 STK
Richard Grant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2011, 09:31 PM   #64
borninamopar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SW Mississippi
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Grant View Post
Don't give Ford and Mopar any ideas. I am not sure they aren't already equiped with something similiar. But then it's "stock". I guess all the rest of the stock racers can just go bracket race and leave "stock" to the high dollar factory cars.
Uh, it is bracket racing, unless it's a heads up race.
borninamopar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 12:18 AM   #65
Richard Grant
Member
 
Richard Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Monroe, La.
Posts: 301
Likes: 9
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

Exactly, that's the reason it's not bracket racing.
__________________
Richard Grant 4988 STK
Richard Grant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 03:52 AM   #66
SS Engine Guy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

The absolute only interest that I have ever had in S/SS was to either get beaten (fair and square) in a heads up race, or to win (fair and square) in a heads up race. In the first senario I know that I have to do more work in order to win the next time. In the latter I know that the work and time I invested was not wasted.
Go back to class winners only run in eliminations and the winner and runner up goes thru teardown and everyone that says "its still bracket racing" will see exactly the difference. Bulls*&t hp factors excluded of course.

Once upon a time, a class winner decal/trophy and a record on the wall actually meant something. The way we have allowed our sport to be watered down its now not worth the gaskets.
SS Engine Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 07:05 AM   #67
goinbroke2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 898
Likes: 1,668
Liked 395 Times in 154 Posts
Default Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes View Post
the only issue I see is the vast difference from a fast A/FX car to a slow V/S car. I thin it might be time for all stockers to have the same safety specs
Sure, and time for all S/SS to have pro stock spec too!



And pro stock have top fool spec......

(in case you didn't get the sarcasm)
goinbroke2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 07:16 AM   #68
Todd
Junior Member
 
Todd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

Quote:
Originally Posted by boster58 View Post
If the new cars go into there own classes what does it matter to anyone else what they weight ? The point of the new classes is to keep the old cars in the traditional classes where they can race and be competitive .

The point of the new cars is that they were designed and built to be race cars ,and go fast from the factory and they should be in there own classes . We cant change the past but be can influence the future . We now have two major car companies building factory race car . They seem to want to be involved in our sport .

Let's keep them involved , let them build the cars to go fast , keep the weight off them and let the car owners go out and have fun with there new race cars

I sold my beloved LS1 Firebirds because I want to go fast and have a new race car with a blower . I have 3 corvette's in my garage and Im a GM guy , but Im impressed with the drag pack & cobra jet cars . I bought a 2008 cobra # 49 a plan on running it as hard as I can , not because I want to kill the index but because thats what it was built for .

My cobalt is for sale now and when its gone a 2012 cobra jet will replace it for super stock . These cars are very serious race cars and I for one hope to see more factory cars coming soon especially from GM but for now Im with Ford. For the record the new cars from the factory cost less then building a new 69 camaro ZL1 or 67 shelby .

Bo Kenney
Great post Bo, you are correct about the cost factor too.
__________________
Todd Melville
Melville Racing
1577 T/STK
Todd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 08:47 AM   #69
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

Quote:
Originally Posted by goinbroke2 View Post
Sure, and time for all S/SS to have pro stock spec too!



And pro stock have top fool spec......

(in case you didn't get the sarcasm)
maybe not the same but i think requiring a 6 point bar and harness in all stockers would be a great idea. Stop and think about the physics of a 3800lb cobra jet ending up in your door at over 140mph. Still don't think you need the same safety equipment?
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 09:08 AM   #70
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 3,601
Liked 7,782 Times in 1,743 Posts
Default Re: Want to loose 3200 ugly pounds?

Umm Chad, go to your local bracket track (NHRA) and check out the ET breaks for Super and Pro. 14 second street cars race 9 second 140 mph cars every weekend all over the country and it doesn't seem to bother NHRA one bit. Don't go getting NHRA all cranked up and costing me money!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K

Last edited by Billy Nees; 05-12-2011 at 09:11 AM.
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.