|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Now posted on Lucas site
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Oh well (note sig change from AA/SA to A/SA), it effects everyone the same. Unless you can't run .3 under
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
|
![]()
can you post the link someone thanks
__________________
Sean Ward NHRA s/ss/comp#2882 SW4 MOTORSPORTS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Moline, Illlinois
Posts: 194
Likes: 1
Liked 13 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
__________________
Joe Schaechter 3168 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]()
The AHFS will impact very few combinations with the new indexs. The HP committees job just got alot easier.
The new Mustangs and Mopars will most likely never see an adjustment. The proper way to adjust horsepower ratings is to take the average under the index runs of each car/engine combination and average them against each other. Example: car/engine average for combination X = .95 under index car/engine average for combination Y = .75 under index The HP needs to be adjusted for up (raised) for combination X or lowered (decreased) for combination Y. They aren't reinventing the wheel or performing brain surgery here. Last edited by fredjohnston; 12-18-2009 at 03:31 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 703
Likes: 125
Liked 488 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
WOW!! Now I can run all out and not worry about getting too far up the qualifing sheet. LOL!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Or they could've just moved the trigger up .15, which is primarily what they've done. It just won't LOOK like a -1.55 under run on paper next time.
![]()
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 760
Likes: 16
Liked 620 Times in 87 Posts
|
![]()
What about class winners do they still need to run -.50 under to win class?
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: east hartford ct.
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I'm just curious, what happens to all the records now ? Do they change, or do they just start from scratch, or will there be all new records ?
I guess this was to even things out , but it seems to me like the sand baggers will be even farther ahead now. like if you run all out and your a sec. under , you'll be .7 under now , but if you were holding some at a sec. under , now you can run it hard and still be ahead of the game.
__________________
Mark Markow 171 ss/tb |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 703
Likes: 125
Liked 488 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
NHRA could have approached the indexes a different way. They could've just made a valve spring pressure rule that would slow everyone up. Make it so that the pressure can't exceed 150 lbs on the seat. But NHRA doesn't want to work for their membership money which means testing pressures of the valve springs.
Casey Miles 248H (Exceptionally/Slow) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|