|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
You need to have a staff meeting on this! Seems to be some ambiguity on the specs between the GT500 & the CJ500 engine specs. But for the real tech heads, it's all on-line at www.nhra.com . (From Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords online 02/11/2009, see complete article and source @ http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...jet/index.html ) "...Ford delivers the Cobra Jet cars with a glaring 400 horsepower (nudge-nudge, wink-wink), a rating far under the combination's potential thanks to Ford Racing electronically controlling output so that it fits in the rules. Let's be realistic, the engine is a GT500 powerplant with a TVS blower, larger throttle body and MAF sensor, and long-tube headers amongst some other minor details. The 400 horse rating is far less than what that engine could produce with a little bit of a workout on the chassis dyno...." Seeing that Ford Racing is "Ford Racing electronically controlling output", I'm still sticking to my prediction of 9.38 @ 142 that will ultimately be unleashed from these Shelby's, err, Mustangs! And one last thing and then I quit, if these were labeled "Shelby's" with the "lite-weight drag-pack" option instead of Mustangs, I wouldn't have any beef. Congratulations on Ford putting together one helluva package!
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX Last edited by Jeff Lee; 02-12-2009 at 02:10 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 30
Liked 239 Times in 94 Posts
|
![]()
Ford did that with the 428 Cobra Jet too but it's been worked out fairly. The engine relies on boost rather than RPM and if that is limited so is power. These things have tiny 3 1/2" bores and huge 4 1/4' strokes.
The Shelby GT500 could just as well have been called the Mustang Cobra but marketing it on the Shelby name and heritage seems to have worked well for sales. Check the window sticker on one and see where they are shipped from. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Today and for the last several years, Ford Motor Company has only produced for public roadways a Mustang with either a 4.6L V-8 and a V-6.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 30
Liked 239 Times in 94 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
No Chad I don't think those combos make that much HP. Yes, the car is underfactored, but you can't say put this combo on a dyno and adjust the HP but don't worry about all the other combos in the guide. I think you guys are blowing this out of proportion. I don't think there will be that many people running them. Who would want to work on one, much less tear it down at the track? There has been a supercharged Mustang in the guide for years and nobody has run one (that I have seen).
Does anyone know how many people are planning on running this combo? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Tim Kish 3032 SS/GS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Benton, Arkansas
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
That is a sweeeeeeeeet car!!!!!! Good for FORD.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|