|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 2,803
Liked 2,487 Times in 698 Posts
|
![]()
My problems above mentioned were with the new smiths lifters..... my friend just destroyed his 340 engine last week with the punk coming off and busting his cam with another brand new set of Smiths. These things are expensive junk with a nonexistant warrantee, built by people who could care less about your problems. This has not changed over the years no matter what name is on their business!!! John Irving 741 Stk/SS
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,819
Likes: 2,910
Liked 5,127 Times in 1,955 Posts
|
![]()
They should have never been allowed in the first place. They are WAY outside of the intent of Stock rules.
Back in the day of Greg X and Marty Barrett, can you imagine if you took a stock lifter and machined off the bottom and replaced it with a ceramic puck? You and your parts would have been bounced out of the barn so fast , you would have been hit in the a** with a broom on the way out.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 57
Liked 507 Times in 116 Posts
|
![]()
........
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S Last edited by Bob Gullett; 04-23-2013 at 12:36 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|