|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, the 86-88 T-Bird is legal with the 5.0 H.O. Mustang GT engine.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,682 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewistown, Montana
Posts: 550
Likes: 78
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Dang, one of these 85s got crushed here about a month ago. I used parts off of it to fix and flip an 89 I got cheap...
__________________
Joe Toller Lewistown, MT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,809
Likes: 2,899
Liked 5,111 Times in 1,948 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, it's a Fox body. Here's your first D/R part (Billy excepted): https://www.summitracing.com/parts/s.../model/mustang
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 01-29-2019 at 04:08 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 358
Likes: 1,440
Liked 564 Times in 134 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,682 Times in 1,730 Posts
|
![]()
IMHO, the Lincoln is still one bad U/SA combo but the Mustang should be a pretty good N/O/P combo.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It's possible to run the index with that 325-350 cfm throttle body, but it will take some doing.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 2,790
Liked 2,469 Times in 695 Posts
|
![]()
I have thought about 82 combo for years. I drove one back in 82 as my daily driver and it ran Low 15's
@ 88 mph with zero modifications. As I recall, I ran best shifting it at 5200-5400. It was a stick car and I believe with decent tires it would have edged the high 14's ( It had some weird Metric Wheel and Tire combo that was rock hard).I I have known about this combo a long time but I never said anything since we run some of the same classes with Jr.'s car...........It sound like the cat just got out of the bag now! We have run very well with the OEM cast pistons and production style/width rings in the boy's 318 and did not go to the big money pistons/rings till we had TriCity build our latest engine a couple of year ago. It was a second under the old index without spending a bunch of money. It currently belongs to one of our friends and may still have some good years of racing yet! Last edited by GTX JOHN; 07-01-2011 at 02:38 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
John,
Only because I have one sitting in the yard I've glanced at the '64 Valiant V100 sedan with the 2bbl 273 and 4sp. It seems to fit in P but I'm not sure but since some of the Mopar guys are running this same engine in the wagons I was wondering if it was a viable combo. JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]()
I went 12.90's in Q/S with my 65 valiant 273 bbl 4 speed at 100mph. Not a killer but it will run with the good motor out of my U car i could probably go 12.70 today. The other combos out there are much better, cheaper and last but not least simpler to build.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|