HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-17-2011, 09:37 AM   #1
Casey Miles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 128
Liked 508 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Pro Stock

Pro Stock is in need of a change anyway, they should be flat hoods with FI, 375 ci. No one can relate to 500 ci with 2 x4 carbs anymore. Funny cars with doors!
Casey Miles
248H Stock?
Casey Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 11:54 AM   #2
Detroit Bob
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Grosse Pointe Woods Mi
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Pro Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey Miles View Post
Pro Stock is in need of a change anyway, they should be flat hoods with FI, 375 ci. No one can relate to 500 ci with 2 x4 carbs anymore. Funny cars with doors!
Casey Miles
248H Stock?
Lets face it the best you can say about the bodies on funny cars and pro stocks are, they look cartoonish. The beauty of pro stock in the early days, and funny car to an extent, were the bodies were recognizable . You didn't have to slap the name on the front of the thing to tell me what make it was.
Nhra needs to start over again with a rules package that makes sense for the manufacturers as well as the spectating public. That means in pro stock, stock bodies and production style engines. Funny car needs to adopt rules closer to the nostalgia funny cars.
__________________
Bob Kowal STK 345
Detroit Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 09:59 AM   #3
Tom keedle
Senior Member
 
Tom keedle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Pro Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detroit Bob View Post
Lets face it the best you can say about the bodies on funny cars and pro stocks are, they look cartoonish. The beauty of pro stock in the early days, and funny car to an extent, were the bodies were recognizable . You didn't have to slap the name on the front of the thing to tell me what make it was.
Nhra needs to start over again with a rules package that makes sense for the manufacturers as well as the spectating public. That means in pro stock, stock bodies and production style engines. Funny car needs to adopt rules closer to the nostalgia funny cars.
ON THE OTHER HAND, take a look at nascars' COT
pretty much the same thing as funny cars,i haven't been able to tell 1 brand from another for years...
Tom keedle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 10:06 AM   #4
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs up Re: Ford and Pro Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim B View Post
Yes but any big corporation (or any well run business for that matter) aims to spend their advertising money to get the most exposure for the buck. It would be hard to justify expenditures in present day NHRA drag racing when you compare the difference between the 10's of thousands of spectators at a Nascar Sprint Cup race and the spectator attendance at an NHRA national event. Yes, NASCAR attendance is down but the sanctioning body is taking proactive measures to reverse the trend. Not that it is soley NHRA's responsibility but you can't even compare the two sanctioning bodies when it comes to the marketing, preservation and expansion of the sports they individually regulate. The lower "classes" in NASCAR (truck, short track and grassroots, etc.) have not even come close to the level of degradation that the NHRA Sportsman categories have experienced, not entirely but largely due to business and common sense proactive measures taken by the sanctioning body. Whenever a regulatory agency choses to ignore a sizeable faction of it's knowledgeable member population it is rare that a declining scenario improves. Sad but true.... JMHO
Very good post on one of the problems with NHRA today.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 11:40 AM   #5
Dennis P Chapman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toms River NJ
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 422
Liked 53 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Pro Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim B View Post
Yes but any big corporation (or any well run business for that matter) aims to spend their advertising money to get the most exposure for the buck. It would be hard to justify expenditures in present day NHRA drag racing when you compare the difference between the 10's of thousands of spectators at a Nascar Sprint Cup race and the spectator attendance at an NHRA national event. Yes, NASCAR attendance is down but the sanctioning body is taking proactive measures to reverse the trend. Not that it is soley NHRA's responsibility but you can't even compare the two sanctioning bodies when it comes to the marketing, preservation and expansion of the sports they individually regulate. The lower "classes" in NASCAR (truck, short track and grassroots, etc.) have not even come close to the level of degradation that the NHRA Sportsman categories have experienced, not entirely but largely due to business and common sense proactive measures taken by the sanctioning body. Whenever a regulatory agency choses to ignore a sizeable faction of it's knowledgeable member population it is rare that a declining scenario improves. Sad but true.... JMHO
Good post Jimi.
__________________
Dennis P Chapman 1904 STK
NHRA National Record Holder Car Owner.
Dennis P Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 12:35 PM   #6
Jimi B
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Pro Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis P Chapman View Post
Good post Jimi.

That was Jim B, not Jimi B lol.


But none the less Id put my name on what he said lol
__________________
Jimmy Bowling BF/S 3808

www.facebook.com/jimib1980
Jimi B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 12:40 PM   #7
Dennis P Chapman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toms River NJ
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 422
Liked 53 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Pro Stock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimi B View Post
That was Jim B, not Jimi B lol.


But none the less Id put my name on what he said lol
Got it wrong sorry to both of you guys.
__________________
Dennis P Chapman 1904 STK
NHRA National Record Holder Car Owner.
Dennis P Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 12:41 PM   #8
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Ford and Pro Stock

Hard to tell new cars apart from a distance on the street. I don't see Pro Stock being any worse than Comp or the new SS/GT cars. How different can you make one jelly bean look from another anyway?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.