|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 762
Likes: 16
Liked 653 Times in 89 Posts
|
![]()
Ed it doesn't hurt me. But how is this rule / new classes going to grow stk and SS? This is the real problem we are facing. Making a rule to please 20 to 30 old farts that race 2-3 times a year makes no sense to me. In the past five years the only new blood we have had is new drivers in 2008 and newer cars. If anything stock should up the year to 1979 and newer cars then all the cry baby's can have something to cry about. I have never seen a sport protect old technology like this.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Charlie,
The old farts that you are bitching, complaining and crybabying about built this sport. You are a Johnny-come-lately compared to the old farts. And we aren't going away anytime soon. So get used to it.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Middletown, IN
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Stockers shouldnt make 900hp.... Just my opinion...hehe As far as protecting old cars goes, It still seems to me that the % of Stockers are mostly the older cars , so why stick it to those guys?( me being included)
__________________
1968 Bird/TRW 455/Home ported 13's, '70 Qjet,Holley Street Dominator manifold, Comp Solid FT, 10.817/122.30/1.440 Workin' on E/SA combo ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
![]()
So guys like me and say Bill Zaskowski should sell our outdated 66 Chevy II's because were old news?
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 437
Likes: 15
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Who only makes 900hp??? I agree they should make a lot more!
__________________
2014 Cobra Jet FS/XX #3345 STK/SS Like us on http://www.facebook.com/pages/Daniel...25886327426822 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
|
![]()
I would be happy about all of the new classes if I were Jason McCormack, or John Calvert, and any other traditional cars in A-F stick and auto classes in stock. Now, once NHRA gets to indexes, I hope they will:
A. Give all of the current/traditional class indexes their three tenths of a second back, as that would make it better for the older cars running against the newer cars in qualifying too. B. Return the altitude correction factors to what they were (for Stock and Super Stock), instead of the .90 class factors. I would prefer both, and based on how Indy was this year, I don't think I should be alone in this thought, because with the AHFS out there, any runs that are 1.25 under the index would trigger the hp factor change anyway. My .02 worth. HAPPY HALLOWEEN ALL!!!! ![]()
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by jarn05; 10-31-2014 at 11:14 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
And maybe I should just keep my opinions to myself seeing as, of all the cars I own, none of them runs higher than P. Oh yeah, there are still some of those factoring mistakes bouncing around that can kick the snot out of my stuff.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 1,583
Liked 1,892 Times in 423 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Billy, the problem is that those cars, and especially the factory programs, simply don't fit in Stock, the way Stock is structured, and they cannot be made to. They don't really fit into Super Stock, either. So, unlike the fuel injected production street cars, you'll never be able to merge them back into the regular classes, and it has nothing to do with them having stick and automatics combined. So long as those programs continue, you will have paper cars built out of the parts catalogs, and intentionally assigned extremely bogus factors. It is the way those programs are designed and intended to work. It allows the factories to participate for the smallest possible investment, and still have their cars go extremely fast. Since NHRA evidently has no desire to create one or two entirely new eliminators, the closest they can come to leveling the field is adding separate classes to the two existing eliminators for the factory programs. I'd love to see those cars truly separated, as much for their own benefit as well as for the rest of us. The truth is, in a completely separate eliminator of their own, they could really be showcased, and do a lot of good for the factories and for drag racing. There is no telling what they could grow those classes into, there's almost no limit, provided it is done right. The Super Stock version of a class like that could be the second coming of Pro Stock, much the way Pro Stock began, properly managed. Unfortunately, I don't think NHRA wants to do that, and I don't think they have enough of the right people to do it, and I expect the number of those people to continue to decline.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 359
Likes: 1,444
Liked 566 Times in 135 Posts
|
![]()
Imagine that, the factory cars got their own classes, like everyone was asking for...and people are STILL complaining!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|