HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-31-2014, 10:06 PM   #1
Charley Downing
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 762
Likes: 16
Liked 653 Times in 89 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Rules

Ed it doesn't hurt me. But how is this rule / new classes going to grow stk and SS? This is the real problem we are facing. Making a rule to please 20 to 30 old farts that race 2-3 times a year makes no sense to me. In the past five years the only new blood we have had is new drivers in 2008 and newer cars. If anything stock should up the year to 1979 and newer cars then all the cry baby's can have something to cry about. I have never seen a sport protect old technology like this.
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK
Charley Downing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 10:40 PM   #2
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Rules

Charlie,
The old farts that you are bitching, complaining and crybabying about built this sport. You are a Johnny-come-lately compared to the old farts. And we aren't going away anytime soon. So get used to it.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 10:50 PM   #3
brent flynn
Senior Member
 
brent flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Middletown, IN
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charley Downing View Post
Ed it doesn't hurt me. But how is this rule / new classes going to grow stk and SS? This is the real problem we are facing. Making a rule to please 20 to 30 old farts that race 2-3 times a year makes no sense to me. In the past five years the only new blood we have had is new drivers in 2008 and newer cars. If anything stock should up the year to 1979 and newer cars then all the cry baby's can have something to cry about. I have never seen a sport protect old technology like this.
Im a newbie to Stock, and my car will most likely never see -.8 under , or better...and I'll probably never ever try to qualify at Indy, even though i live 45 mins from the place. That being said, Its not about protecting old technology, its about cars running about 2 or 3 classes lower, than it should. Its not apples to apples. And this letting off at 1000'? Wth is that? Be real men, run the dang thing out, and face the consequences...These guys already know that their HP ratings are BS...
Stockers shouldnt make 900hp.... Just my opinion...hehe

As far as protecting old cars goes, It still seems to me that the % of Stockers are mostly the older cars , so why stick it to those guys?( me being included)
__________________
1968 Bird/TRW 455/Home ported 13's, '70 Qjet,Holley Street Dominator manifold, Comp Solid FT, 10.817/122.30/1.440
Workin' on E/SA combo 3119 E/SA
brent flynn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 11:27 PM   #4
Ed Carpenter
Live Reporter
 
Ed Carpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Rules

So guys like me and say Bill Zaskowski should sell our outdated 66 Chevy II's because were old news?
__________________
Ed Carpenter
2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM
Race Engine Development
Ed Carpenter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 04:05 PM   #5
D.Johns
Member
 
D.Johns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 437
Likes: 15
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by brent flynn View Post
Stockers shouldnt make 900hp.... Just my opinion...hehe
Who only makes 900hp??? I agree they should make a lot more!
__________________
2014 Cobra Jet FS/XX #3345 STK/SS

Like us on http://www.facebook.com/pages/Daniel...25886327426822
D.Johns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 10:52 PM   #6
GarysZ24
VIP Member
 
GarysZ24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tempe, Az.
Posts: 1,277
Likes: 926
Liked 249 Times in 98 Posts
Send a message via MSN to GarysZ24 Send a message via Yahoo to GarysZ24
Default Re: 2015 Rules

I would be happy about all of the new classes if I were Jason McCormack, or John Calvert, and any other traditional cars in A-F stick and auto classes in stock. Now, once NHRA gets to indexes, I hope they will:

A. Give all of the current/traditional class indexes their three tenths of a second back, as that would make it better for the older cars running against the newer cars in qualifying too.

B. Return the altitude correction factors to what they were (for Stock and Super Stock), instead of the .90 class factors.

I would prefer both, and based on how Indy was this year, I don't think I should be alone in this thought, because with the AHFS out there, any runs that are 1.25 under the index would trigger the hp factor change anyway. My .02 worth.

HAPPY HALLOWEEN ALL!!!!
__________________
Gary Hampton
'86 Z24,173 V6
CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021)
GarysZ24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 11:11 PM   #7
jarn05
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charley Downing View Post
Ed it doesn't hurt me. But how is this rule / new classes going to grow stk and SS? This is the real problem we are facing. Making a rule to please 20 to 30 old farts that race 2-3 times a year makes no sense to me. In the past five years the only new blood we have had is new drivers in 2008 and newer cars. If anything stock should up the year to 1979 and newer cars then all the cry baby's can have something to cry about. I have never seen a sport protect old technology like this.
Charlie that is about one of the dumbest things I have ever read on here . Who are you to*pick on "old farts" and why should it matter to you how much someone races? I am 44 years old been racing for almost 30 years technically I'm one of those old farts. I drive a 1964 Hemi belvedere and would never own a 2008 or newer car. So what your saying is screw James Vignogna his car is old tech so he is out? Give me a break!!!!! I would give both nuts a lung and half my brain to have my " old fart" father alive today to drive his Hemi car again, have some friggin respect. And by the way I have young guys in there twenties building old fart cars.

Last edited by jarn05; 10-31-2014 at 11:14 PM.
jarn05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 08:21 AM   #8
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charley Downing View Post
Yea these new rules are really going to help stk and SS grow. I can't wait to see all the old times come back out to race. You know the guys that bi$ch about NHRA, new cars and everything else. I bet will see 200 new stk and SS racers come out in 2015. Ha ha
Ya know, take away his trash talk and b##lbusting and Charliebob does have a good point. IMHO we really don't need any more new classes. It's just watering down the gene pool some more. NHRA reacted exactly the way that NHRA always reacts when they create a problem. Instead of admitting to creating a problem and fixing it, they just create another entirely different problem. They should have just taken a step back from the AHFS and fixed all of their factoring mistakes (old and new) in one shot. As it stands now, we are going to wind up with a "segregated" eliminator just like when we had all of the FI classes. The difference being, with the FI classes, when the factors got in line(relatively) they were brought back into the regular classes. That will not be as easily done with these new classes as they are combining sticks and autos and (I'm guessing) changing the indexes.
And maybe I should just keep my opinions to myself seeing as, of all the cars I own, none of them runs higher than P. Oh yeah, there are still some of those factoring mistakes bouncing around that can kick the snot out of my stuff.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 08:59 AM   #9
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 1,583
Liked 1,892 Times in 423 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
Ya know, take away his trash talk and b##lbusting and Charliebob does have a good point. IMHO we really don't need any more new classes. It's just watering down the gene pool some more. NHRA reacted exactly the way that NHRA always reacts when they create a problem. Instead of admitting to creating a problem and fixing it, they just create another entirely different problem. They should have just taken a step back from the AHFS and fixed all of their factoring mistakes (old and new) in one shot. As it stands now, we are going to wind up with a "segregated" eliminator just like when we had all of the FI classes. The difference being, with the FI classes, when the factors got in line(relatively) they were brought back into the regular classes. That will not be as easily done with these new classes as they are combining sticks and autos and (I'm guessing) changing the indexes.
And maybe I should just keep my opinions to myself seeing as, of all the cars I own, none of them runs higher than P. Oh yeah, there are still some of those factoring mistakes bouncing around that can kick the snot out of my stuff.

Billy, the problem is that those cars, and especially the factory programs, simply don't fit in Stock, the way Stock is structured, and they cannot be made to. They don't really fit into Super Stock, either.

So, unlike the fuel injected production street cars, you'll never be able to merge them back into the regular classes, and it has nothing to do with them having stick and automatics combined.

So long as those programs continue, you will have paper cars built out of the parts catalogs, and intentionally assigned extremely bogus factors. It is the way those programs are designed and intended to work. It allows the factories to participate for the smallest possible investment, and still have their cars go extremely fast.

Since NHRA evidently has no desire to create one or two entirely new eliminators, the closest they can come to leveling the field is adding separate classes to the two existing eliminators for the factory programs. I'd love to see those cars truly separated, as much for their own benefit as well as for the rest of us.

The truth is, in a completely separate eliminator of their own, they could really be showcased, and do a lot of good for the factories and for drag racing. There is no telling what they could grow those classes into, there's almost no limit, provided it is done right.

The Super Stock version of a class like that could be the second coming of Pro Stock, much the way Pro Stock began, properly managed. Unfortunately, I don't think NHRA wants to do that, and I don't think they have enough of the right people to do it, and I expect the number of those people to continue to decline.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 09:09 AM   #10
Nick Heath
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 359
Likes: 1,444
Liked 566 Times in 135 Posts
Default Re: 2015 Rules

Imagine that, the factory cars got their own classes, like everyone was asking for...and people are STILL complaining!!!
Nick Heath is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.