HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2015, 02:30 PM   #1
Stocker 2
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: NHRA ProStock changes coming!

Pay attention to the Factory Shootouts at select NHRA events and you will see where the Pro Stock replacement is coming from.

The factory wars are just getting started...........and the crowd goes wild!!!!!
Stocker 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 03:21 PM   #2
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,605 Times in 583 Posts
Default Re: NHRA ProStock changes coming!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
I'll offer some constructive suggestions for improving Pro Stock.

First, get rid of the goofy bodies, go back to pure production bodies, or bodies in white, checked by templates. All steel. One small spoiler, no wicker bill, no spill plates, set 30 degree angle, body width, 6" tall. Stock wheelbase. Maximum. 6" hood scoop height. Maximum 16" X 33" slick. Fuel injection, 1500 cfm throttle body, maximum of two. No exotic materials in the engine, or anywhere else in the power train. Leave the current 500 cubic inch, 2350#, 5 forward speeds, manually shifted format in place. We're already asking teams to build all new cars and move to fuel injection. Forcing them to an entirely new power train program simply is not economically feasible or fiscally wise.

Make the cars look like production cars with slicks and a small hoodscoop. Fuel injected, since carburetors are apparently an evil relic of the dinosaur era. Leave the 5 year rule in place, two door rear wheel drive sport coupe only.

That allows the current power train programs to remain relatively intact, while moving into the fuel injected era, with cars fans can relate to, and keeping performance close to where it is, with an even set of relatively simple rules that are the same for everyone. Maybe Ford will play, maybe they won't, but if Chevy and Mopar will, then Ford has no excuse.

The new television contract combined with the marketing program should make it more attractive for OE corporations and sponsors.
Like Alan described and limit them to 400 CID small block engines like the Australian Pro Stock classes.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 04:09 PM   #3
theman440
Member
 
theman440's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Fabulous Las Vegas
Posts: 114
Likes: 29
Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: NHRA ProStock changes coming!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
I'll offer some constructive suggestions for improving Pro Stock.

First, get rid of the goofy bodies, go back to pure production bodies, or bodies in white, checked by templates. All steel. One small spoiler, no wicker bill, no spill plates, set 30 degree angle, body width, 6" tall. Stock wheelbase. Maximum. 6" hood scoop height. Maximum 16" X 33" slick. Fuel injection, 1500 cfm throttle body, maximum of two. No exotic materials in the engine, or anywhere else in the power train. Leave the current 500 cubic inch, 2350#, 5 forward speeds, manually shifted format in place. We're already asking teams to build all new cars and move to fuel injection. Forcing them to an entirely new power train program simply is not economically feasible or fiscally wise.

Make the cars look like production cars with slicks and a small hoodscoop. Fuel injected, since carburetors are apparently an evil relic of the dinosaur era. Leave the 5 year rule in place, two door rear wheel drive sport coupe only.

That allows the current power train programs to remain relatively intact, while moving into the fuel injected era, with cars fans can relate to, and keeping performance close to where it is, with an even set of relatively simple rules that are the same for everyone. Maybe Ford will play, maybe they won't, but if Chevy and Mopar will, then Ford has no excuse.

The new television contract combined with the marketing program should make it more attractive for OE corporations and sponsors.
This sounds like the way to go -
__________________
Jeff Dudgeon
'66 Coronet #10771 - bracket puke
"the Flying Brick"
theman440 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 06:39 PM   #4
Carguy49
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fife, Washington
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 2,536
Liked 2,992 Times in 719 Posts
Default Re: NHRA ProStock changes coming!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
I'll offer some constructive suggestions for improving Pro Stock.

First, get rid of the goofy bodies, go back to pure production bodies, or bodies in white, checked by templates. All steel. One small spoiler, no wicker bill, no spill plates, set 30 degree angle, body width, 6" tall. Stock wheelbase. Maximum. 6" hood scoop height. Maximum 16" X 33" slick. Fuel injection, 1500 cfm throttle body, maximum of two. No exotic materials in the engine, or anywhere else in the power train. Leave the current 500 cubic inch, 2350#, 5 forward speeds, manually shifted format in place. We're already asking teams to build all new cars and move to fuel injection. Forcing them to an entirely new power train program simply is not economically feasible or fiscally wise.

Make the cars look like production cars with slicks and a small hoodscoop. Fuel injected, since carburetors are apparently an evil relic of the dinosaur era. Leave the 5 year rule in place, two door rear wheel drive sport coupe only.

That allows the current power train programs to remain relatively intact, while moving into the fuel injected era, with cars fans can relate to, and keeping performance close to where it is, with an even set of relatively simple rules that are the same for everyone. Maybe Ford will play, maybe they won't, but if Chevy and Mopar will, then Ford has no excuse.

The new television contract combined with the marketing program should make it more attractive for OE corporations and sponsors.


I like the way you are thinking. This idea might need some refining to make it work, but you are on the right track. With the new S/S cars capable of mid to high 7's, what would it take to run 7.0's or quicker?? The bodies should remain as close to stock as possible (no more goofy bodies), and work on removing unneeded items to lighten them a bit (say 2500 min.) What did P.B.Candies car weigh when it went 7.859 at Indy last year?? Well over 3000 lbs. I am sure.


Danny, I too, liked Pro Stock Truck. Shame on NHRA for getting rid of that program.
__________________
Ron McDowell - Did Race
Every day is a Gift - Enjoy with family and friends.
Carguy49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2015, 11:15 AM   #5
blkjack
Member
 
blkjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belle Vernon, PA
Posts: 288
Likes: 26
Liked 55 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: NHRA ProStock changes coming!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post

Make the cars look like production cars with slicks and a small hoodscoop. Fuel injected, since carburetors are apparently an evil relic of the dinosaur era. Leave the 5 year rule in place
the five year body rule has been gone or do you want to bring it back?

SECTION 16 - PRO STOCK
DESIGNATION
PRO, preceded by car number.
Reserved for 2005 or later NHRA-accepted 2-door or 4-door
coupe or sedan (domestic or foreign) production vehicles
blkjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 05:15 PM   #6
Mile High
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: My RV
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smile Re: NHRA ProStock changes coming!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
So, your problem with Pro Stock is pretty much that there are no weight breaks or handicaps, everybody gets 500 cubic inches and 2350 pounds, and the same rules, but your favorite OE corporation won't make the effort to compete. So, they need to throw 300 pounds on the Chevrolets, and make them pull a plug wire if they are not racing another Chevrolet. Got it, thanks. Wonder why Alllen Johnson and Mopar don't need that?
Instead of making it where all manufacturers want to participate lets keep it an all GM class and bore everyone silly. Why watch when you know a Camaro is going to win. How competitve has AJ been this season, up until the last race he hasn't. V Gaines is a nice guy but it will take a near miracle for him to get a win. I do wish Ford would get involved. I would watch with more interest. Sorry, just my 2cents.

Jeff
__________________
Street legal 64 Falcon Sprint with 410W living in Texas.
Stock - Super Stock fan
Mile High is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 07:06 PM   #7
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 1,589
Liked 1,907 Times in 427 Posts
Default Re: NHRA ProStock changes coming!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mile High View Post
Instead of making it where all manufacturers want to participate lets keep it an all GM class and bore everyone silly. Why watch when you know a Camaro is going to win. How competitve has AJ been this season, up until the last race he hasn't. V Gaines is a nice guy but it will take a near miracle for him to get a win. I do wish Ford would get involved. I would watch with more interest. Sorry, just my 2cents.

Jeff

The class was dying when they were catering the rules to suit a given combination. It does not work. Any brief spike seen in attendance and participation when it is tried is short lived, at best.

The rules are the same for everyone right now. You have 2350 pounds, 500 cubic inches, and 5 manually shifted forward speeds for everyone, GM, Ford, and Chrysler. The only thing keeping Ford out of Pro Stock is Ford, period, plain and simple. It is unfortunate for Ford fans that Ford is not willing to put forth the effort, but that is a decision that Ford has made, despite the efforts of guys such as Morgan and Cunningham, among others.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 09:05 PM   #8
CobraJET5.0
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: NHRA ProStock changes coming!

Quote:
Originally Posted by russellauto1 View Post
How about taking away points or fining them for incomplete or abandoned runs. No one wants to sit through a session of 12 out of 16 cars making 60ft runs. Same For FC and TF.

Or give them points for completing the run. Either way, It will get more exciting.


That is one of the stupidest things I have ever read. They should drive the cars until they end up in the wall or up side down? Get real dude.
CobraJET5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2015, 09:20 PM   #9
Dana Fitzpatrick
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 148
Likes: 4
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: NHRA ProStock changes coming!

Economy,economy,economy.That's the problem,as I see it. All the classes are down,percentage wise,I wonder how the PS counts compare to stk/ss.
Dana Fitzpatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2015, 10:05 PM   #10
B/SA 187
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: cape cod,ma
Posts: 50
Likes: 94
Liked 36 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: NHRA ProStock changes coming!

DIV 1 83 stokers at new England points race
B/SA 187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.