|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The only reason it was not in stock when it came out, there was no weight break for it to fit into. There was no FS/AA class. I don't know, but i don't think the 5.4 combo is better than a 5.2 just because the sc is bigger. I also don’t think most will agree when you say most will agree...duh. Its in the guide so I don’t know what your point is. This thread is about ford giving then taking it back for un know reasons. I wish someone from ford would come on here and tells us why, is that to much to ask.
5.2 Combo bore 3.631 stroke 3.649 Piston- dome 12.5 CR Cam- .590 lift Throttle body- bigger than the 5.4 Valves- 2 -1.513 2 -1.285 RPM 9000 rpm+ supercharger 2.9 pulley size 3.25 inch ram air front entrance supercharger 5.4 Combo bore 3.553 stroke 4.166 piston- flat 10.5 cr cam- lift .473 Throttle body smaller than the 5.2 valves- 2 -1.462 2 -1.265 rpm 8200+ supercharger 4.0 pulley size 4 inch no ram air rear entrance super charger |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Likes: 2
Liked 66 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Doug, Funny you say that, Mike D. worked for Dodge for 30 years and if you want free stuff from Ford you have to own a Dodge, race a Dodge, or build Dodge/Mopar engines. Jim D'Amore |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|