|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 572
Likes: 39
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,501
Likes: 3,603
Liked 7,788 Times in 1,744 Posts
|
![]()
WAIT A MINUTE, WAIT A MINUTE, are we talking about the FFFord Racing program or NHRA?!?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 437
Likes: 15
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
proposal accepted because it was shown to be profitable. Remember this is 2008 just after the giant financial meltdown. A time when Ford sold nearly every brand and took out massive loans leveraging the blue oval itself under Mulally/Fields One Ford plan. You weren’t going to get anything through if it wasn’t world class leading and was profitable.
__________________
2014 Cobra Jet FS/XX #3345 STK/SS Like us on http://www.facebook.com/pages/Daniel...25886327426822 Last edited by D.Johns; 04-16-2019 at 09:06 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 712
Liked 1,597 Times in 583 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, initially the class created lots of issues while the cars were running against the older cars. Nevertheless, they have their own class, the class has grown and lots of followers. Last edited by SSDiv6; 04-17-2019 at 08:07 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 769
Likes: 75
Liked 534 Times in 143 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 108
Likes: 6
Liked 122 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
To Jeff. John and Bill, thank you for your kind words. I had dinner with Jimmy Ronzello and Robin Lawrence recently and I told them how much I missed the sharing of ideas and general bench racing.
Quote:
I'm sorry you feel this way. I think that's what I told you a decade ago as well when you were sending letters to Brian and I. Your dislike for the new cars is well documented, and you have a right to your opinion but I think there are facts you are choosing to ignore, positive consequences and actions that were the result of the CJ program (as well as the DP and Copo). Ford contingency for older cars would not have existed for the last decade if not for the CJ. Ford posted NHRA contingency for older cars when neither Chevy or Mopar did. Ford posted in IHRA for all Fords. We posted in NMRA & NMCA when the market was crashing and it was on the table to cut. I went to the mat to protect these programs because if they were cut it's unlikely they would ever come back. These programs were kept as part of the larger sportsman drag racing because of the CJ. When possible Ford found ways to pay racers for succeeding in a Ford. When Nick Morris had a strong season with his CJ-powered FGT Mustang we paid him the CJ payouts. When Paul Wong won a class championship we paid him the Ford payout even though some of the races that gave him points were in a brand X. When contingency sponsors were dropping off from Class payouts Ford stuck in there and even went to other sponsors requesting they stay involved. We encouraged all CJ parts suppliers to post contingency and talked several out of withdrawing. I would often write notes on the contingency check stubs congratulating and thanking racers regardless of what model year Ford they ran but those checks wouldn't exist wtihout the CJ program. Ford gave sportsman dinners for all brand sportsman racers for several years. Even when Vegas gouged us huge on pricing we kept our commitment to the racers and held the event and stayed until late in the night when the dessert was freezing. I met Ritchie Paulie at this event and spoke with him several times over the years about his vintage Ford even last year at the CJ 50th party with Don Keen. If Ford hadn't done those dinners I'm not sure NHRA would do the Indy sportsman dinner, nor do I think Skillman would do theirs. Skillman might not even be in racing without the CJ and if they weren't that's one less sponsor for David Rampy, and one less car for Joey Shipp to drive. When we promoted Indy class winners with a 2-page Dragster ad, we always included the non-CJ Ford's. We didn't have to do this and no one above my pay grade weighed in on it. Ford supported adding FS classes to separate the package cars to not hurt the older cars in heads-up races. On behalf of Ford I sought additional classes for vintage cars so we could bring in new sponsors specifically for classic race cars and offered to use my relationships with Year 1, Shelby, Scott Drake, Mother's, and any Ford officially licensed restoration hardware company to try and bring them in as sponsors/contingency sponsors for vintage classes. Unfortunately this didn't happen but the effort was there to reward lifelong Ford racers even if they weren't in the latest iron. CJ brought in new racers that contributed to the companies this community relies on. It helps having new customers spending money to keep businesses afloat and profitable, especially during down times. Ford offered X-plan pricing to all drag racers with a sanctioning body membership regardless of what they raced. I gave out about 30 per year on average. Several racers on this board took advantage of this and on a Super Duty it saves thousands (as much as $7k if memory serves)! Without an active CJ program I doubt this continues because there will be no one to administer it. Ford promoted the CJ and by extension NHRA racing whenever possible. It was all over our website, e-blasts, and marketing materials. WHen our racers won we included them on our email newsletter and on Facebook feeds. We ran an ad celebrating the 8-second club as racers broke that barrier in their Ford's. There was nothing stealth about our effort. Ford enjoyed, and as far as I know continues to have a productive working relationship with NHRA, that doesn't sound like deception to me. Losing the CJ will likely be followed by losses for all Ford racers from sponsors, to contingency, to parts availability, to NHRA rules. So when you say many of you want the CJ gone, you're also wishing less help and support for at least some of your fellow racers. As for whistle blowers I assume you are implying someone in Ford shared your view on the program and spoke with you about it. I am aware of a single individual who was vocal about his disdain for the program, he called the CJ owners the "haves". He was included on the 2010 model discussions. After that he was not part of the CJ team and was not directly involved with the program through the 2016 model, the last one I was there for. When I consulted him it was generally to get the perspective of someone with an opinion similar to yours. So while I wouldn't be surprised if you an he discussed something, I would be very surprised if during my tenure he knew details on the inner workings of the program or NHRA negotiations to share with you and I doubt anyone else from the CJ team communicated with you. The decisions around sportsman drag racing and the CJ program were done with the intention of growing the sport and community around production based racing, with Ford profiting from all ships rising. This isn't to say that in hindsight Ford and their representative (me), always did the right thing. I made mistakes and sometimes I didn't agree with the direction I was told to take. And sometimes older cars did not benefit. When you're trying to make something new and desirable by default something else becomes less desirable. And there were times sitting in the NHRA tech trailer I knew doing the right thing for Ford and the new race cars meant that older race cars would be less desirable. This was part of the job, and in racing not everyone gets a trophy. I know there were times when despite my desire to help older car racers my resources were focused on selling new cars so I'm sure there are some older car customers that felt Ford didn't do enough for them and for that I'm sorry. But there was never an agenda of maliciousness toward non-CJ's and the objectives of the program were to bring more to sportsman racing, not less. Losing the CJ will likely mean less from Ford for all Ford racers, and to a degree all sportsman racers.
__________________
Jesse Kershaw Last edited by Jesse Kershaw; 04-19-2019 at 08:16 AM. Reason: clarity, added x plan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 2,174
Liked 2,354 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
Jesse is spot on about the disarray in the parts division of Ford Performance. I have been a Ford Motorsport/Racing/Performance warehouse distributor for over 25 years and the business model is the worst I have ever seen. Parts on the website without picture or prices is a constant problem. There seems to be one person in the shipping department who does not care how he or she packs orders as a lot of parts in small boxes will have the box crushed by the bigger heavier items. This a top down problem and can only be corrected from the top down. I have dealt with many different people at FP and I honestly have liked everyone of them. They are so nice that I have a difficult time raising any hell for fear of hurting their feelings. I even liked the Mopar racer, Jim's best buddy. I too would like for Jesse to return to his position at Ford but he would be a fool to do it without major changes to the business model.
best regards, Roland |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|