|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 1,135
Liked 905 Times in 193 Posts
|
![]()
Drive up to the gate, plunk down $500 clams, and they hand you a wally. Turn around and go home. No teardown, no AHFS, no wear and tear on your car, no lodging expenses. Track makes money and everyone goes home happy...
__________________
Bob Don 128 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3,884
Liked 805 Times in 341 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Indianola Washington
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Liked 456 Times in 148 Posts
|
![]()
Interesting idea to add 5 to all indexes.
How about a two tier Index system. Lower the current Index's 3. Then add back 6 or 7 for the second, high index for each class. When you enter a race you identify your index choice. Must run that index for the race. Qualifing ladder is base off the lower index number for each class. No HP penalties under 1.20. Mandatory tear down 1.20 under or more. Happy Thanksgiving Steve Teeter. STK. 6380 /6283 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=SDT1DYI;602923]Interesting idea to add 5 to all indexes.
Make them half a second SLOWER?? Did I understand correctly? Everybody runs under now, so we are simply bracket racing like it is. I was thinking they need to be half a second faster. Who can not run over half a second under now? If there are people who can not, maybe they need to work on their stuff harder?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coeymans, NY
Posts: 135
Likes: 215
Liked 128 Times in 33 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: sooner state
Posts: 105
Likes: 3
Liked 64 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
I can’t run .500 under......Will somebody please explain to me,as I asked in a previous post,what were the great things that happened the last time indexes were lowered?it got rid of some cars who could not run fast enough,is that supposed to be a good thing?did it stop people from running too fast and getting hp?did it make the fast cars not be the fast cars anymore?Yes,I know it is a performance based category and I’m glad it is,but just how fast do you have to go........to be World Champ.....? Victor Penrod
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 34
Liked 138 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]()
.3 here, .5 there.....That's what you call "getting nickel-&-dimed to death"! Just as you start reaching for that dollar on the ground, somebody pulls the string that's attached to it.
__________________
LOCOMOTION Racing |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pukwana SD
Posts: 860
Likes: 554
Liked 99 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Ed Wright;603444]
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Jim Hanig;603813]Jim, do you know anybody that can not run more than five tenths under their index?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: kansas
Posts: 235
Likes: 505
Liked 249 Times in 48 Posts
|
![]()
Here's the part I don't get. If I've got a car that runs 1.5 under why wouldn't I want a bunch of cars in my class that can only run .1 under? I'm old. What am I missing?
Pete |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|