|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 1,085
Liked 7,968 Times in 1,524 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 3,601
Liked 7,780 Times in 1,743 Posts
|
![]()
and this too!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Sierra's
Posts: 165
Likes: 462
Liked 449 Times in 98 Posts
|
![]()
"Now why don't we talk about Electronic cheating, nobody has much to say about that?" Greg Luneack
Since we know NHRA doesn't have the man power, I think we should be talking about what counter measures can be enacted through the rules that make electronic cheating less feasible. What changes are racers willing to tolerate, that make it more difficult to cheat? Are we willing to give up drive shaft speed sensors? Are we willing to use NHRA certified ignition boxes and tachs? Ignitions and tachs that could allow NHRA to easily plug in a diagnostic device to see if its been tampered with? Are we willing to have qualified fields that make it difficult to sandbag. I believe down track timing controls are more effective if your able to run a dial in (drive shaft speed profile) that are 3-4 tenths slower than the car is capable of running. Should we all pay an extra $50 on the entry fee to pay for a tech savy official to really do a good job of rooting out electronic cheating devices at NHRA sanctioned events? Should a separate Nostalgia Stock and Super Stock class be created that prohibits programmable ignitions such as the grid. Maybe run cable drive tachs again? Let the new EFI cars run whatever they want in their own class? I don't know what the answer is, but I am interested in it what others think will work to deter electronic cheating. NHRA clearly is on our side when it comes to prohibiting electronic cheating, but we need to be realistic about what can be reasonably expected from NHRA Tech without changes to make their job easier. Last edited by DG; 03-11-2021 at 11:11 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 894
Likes: 686
Liked 1,034 Times in 368 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 232
Likes: 274
Liked 167 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
With everything you can do with the new fuel injection systems, is there really anything that can be done to curb the electronic cheating?
__________________
Tim Schmackpfeffer 762 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Mo-ta City
Posts: 247
Likes: 59
Liked 31 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 242
Likes: 20
Liked 109 Times in 32 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The tech guys that we interact with at races do a great job. This isn't on them. NHRA is responsible for keeping a fair playing field and giving tech the authority to do their job.
__________________
Drew Whalen Stk 3186 Last edited by Whalen3186; 03-13-2021 at 11:49 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Sierra's
Posts: 165
Likes: 462
Liked 449 Times in 98 Posts
|
![]()
The tech guys that we interact with at races do a great job. This isn't on them. NHRA should is responsible for keeping a fair playing field and giving tech the authority to do their job.[/QUOTE]
To be clear, I am not putting this on the tech guys in any way. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 507
Likes: 8
Liked 358 Times in 83 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 1,085
Liked 7,968 Times in 1,524 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|