|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 566
Likes: 1,606
Liked 1,171 Times in 333 Posts
|
![]()
Pardon my ignorance, but what do you mean by 1 lb breaks? Does that mean instead of 14, 14.5, 15 lb/hp it would just be 14 and 15 lb/hp? I can see how that would simplify Stock and cut the number of classes in half. It'd suck for me, but would make the class even more performance oriented. Be a blast to watch, but not so fun to race.
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 3,588
Liked 7,687 Times in 1,732 Posts
|
![]()
The money? That's a joke! My broker can't understand why certain Racers are willing to spend $100,000 to make $2,000. Not a good investment.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 613
Liked 1,917 Times in 575 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Personally i dont see that an index reduction will enhance our classes. Maybe accelerate the eventual end of the classes. we have been loosing racetracks here in D2 this year we only have 4 tracks hosting divisional races. Lower car counts will not help that. We all need to do what is necessary to improve the health of the classes to preserve our style of racing. I have been racing SS for over 40 years. its always been a shoe polish class since I started. There are classes that run all out, no dial, no break out in NHRA if that is your style then maybe step up to comp, pro stock, FX or pro mod.
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|