|
![]() |
#91 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.amazingmusclecars.com/1512registry/guest.php http://www.the1512hurstscramblerregi...ng_history.php
__________________
without losers,winning means nothing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
1969 AMC SC/Rambler
Was a result of a collaboration between AMC's Walt Czamecki and Dave Landrith from Hurst Performance Research. On February 13, 1969, AMC had a press release, announcing the partnership deal with Hurst Performance. The heart of the SC/Rambler was the 390 V-8. It's 315 HP peak came on relatively early at 4600 RPM, but there was a barrel full of low-end torque, at 425 lb-ft @3200 RPM. For a high performance engine, the compression was somewhat mild at 10.2 -1 with flat top pistons. Atop the cast iron dual-plane high rise intake manifold, was a Carter AFB (625 CFM) with 1.44" primaries and 1.69" secondaries. Log-style exhaust manifolds dumped to 2.25" dual-exhaust with genuine Thrush glass-packs and chrome angle-tipped exhaust tips. While AMC didn't offer any other engine choices for the SC/Rambler, dealers could direct buyers to the Group 19 parts book. The Borg-Warner T-10 (Close-ratio) was the cars only transmission, fitted with a Hurst Competition/Plus shifter with Hurst linkage, and Hurst 'T' handle. The rear-end was a Dana 20 unit, fitted with 3.54 gears and a Twin-Grip limited slip differential. Heavy-duty universal joints were installed, to help spin the power. The SC/Rambler utilized the same unit body as the Rogue, but to handle the 390's torque, additional frame mounts were fitted to accept the AMX's torque-links. Up front, the SC/Rambler utilized an independent front suspension with unequal length upper and lower control arms, coil springs and tubular shocks, as well as a large stabilizer bar. At the rear, the live axle was mounted to semi-elliptical leaf springs and torque-links. The left shock was staggered to control wheel hop. Mounting-plates were welded to the frame for this specific suspension design. Inside the SC/Rambler, a charcoal vinyl split-bench seat with red/white/blue striped head-rests was up front. A three-spoke steering wheel with a plastic wood grain rim greeted the driver. A huge Sun S635 8000 RPM Tachometer was strapped to the steering column. Initially, only 500 were to be produced. These 'first' 500 were painted Bright White with Bright Red flanks, a wide Bright Blue stripe on the deck-lid and roof, and Bright Blue wheels. This was known as the 'A' paint scheme. On the hood was the 'Mail Box' hood scoop. Just in case no one noticed it, a large blue arrow pointed directly where the cold air was headed was painted on the hood, red lettered '390 Cu. In' was the engine call-out in between the blue arrow, and red lettered 'AIR' was placed on the hood scoop. Paint Scheme 'A' ![]() Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 03-20-2012 at 03:46 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
PC, great write up on the specs on the '69 SC/Rambler.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Hemi Moose; 03-20-2012 at 01:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Moose,
Great photo post as usual,,,,,,,,,,,,you are the best... ![]() More on the SC/Rambler, Featuring a Borg-Warner T-10 close-ratio all-syncromesh transmission with; (1st; 2.23) (2nd; 1.73) (3rd; 1.35) (4th; 1.00) ratios. Also, a special heavy-duty clutch set-up. Sub-frame connectors between the front and rear sub-frames. A special steel plate riveted in the trunk, to provide for additional shock tower support. Brackets for the sub-frame ends, that bolted to a threaded portion of the sub-frame. Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 03-21-2012 at 02:46 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
i have a 69 2dr sedan and it has the subframe connectors... unless we're talking about 2 different things
__________________
without losers,winning means nothing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
There it is, on the SC/Rambler Hurst specification sheet.
#3160 lbs. (10.03 Wt/Hp Factor),,,,,,,F/Stock or Super Stock (SS/J) Does anybody remember if the listed weight of the car was exaggerated by AMC to get the car into F/Stock (10.00 - 10.49 Wt/Hp). Some say E/Stock for 1969, and others say F/Stock. The 1967 Rogue hardtop with the 343 engine weighed in at #2971 lbs. Where was the other 189 lbs. pc Last edited by Paul Ceasrine; 03-24-2012 at 10:08 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
btw, i think the 343 ramblers in 67 were the reason for the connectors.... ![]() they're NOT a very stiff car without them...
__________________
without losers,winning means nothing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 63
Liked 756 Times in 189 Posts
|
![]()
According to the classification guide, the SC/Rambler shipping weight is 3058. In comparison, the '65 Chevy II SS with a 327 is 2882 and the '66 Chevy II SS is 2917. Considering that the AMC V8 is approx 60 lbs heavier than the SBC and that AMC used a cast iron T10 to GM's aluminum Muncie, the weights seem reasonable and not "adjusted".
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|