|
![]() |
#91 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 2,585
Liked 2,719 Times in 959 Posts
|
![]()
I believe the NHRA has zero interest in revitalizing Pro Stock and would prefer Pro Mod as a replacement.
The theory being discussed on this thread is a pipe dream for those of us who witnessed the birth of Pro Stock. The NHRA wants to simplify not complicate things. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 560
Likes: 45
Liked 52 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
http://www.nhra.com/story/2016/12/7/...ock-camaro-ss/
What the heck, that's what the street car should look like, it's better and WAY more beautiful looking.
__________________
Bernie Cunningham 7053 STK Last edited by Bernie Cunningham; 12-07-2016 at 10:20 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 6
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
True. I love my wimpy V6 street brick. Inferno Red, sort of like Candy Red.
__________________
Mopar 2 Ya! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 6
Liked 70 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
If you would put a flat hood on the new NHRA Camaro, it looks a lot like a Toyota Camry.
__________________
Chris Bowman The Mountain State Mustang 1984 Mustang GT350 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Better show up with a truckload of sheet metal. Your going to need it. So if I'm reading this correctly, move the Factory Race Cars currently running stock.... Into a newly formed Pro Stock?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#96 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 163
Likes: 5
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Jr pro stock same guide lines pretty much but when your dealing with def ears........................................ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Ask the present Pro Stock owners what they need.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Pro stock should be left to its own end.
FS cars should have their own classes heads up only. 3200 lb. FSA fastest 350cu in supercharged. FSB 426/427/428 NA FSC 350 NA no FS cars allowed in stock This will put*stock guys in these classes. The pro stock guys/galls who no longer can afford PS can go to these classes. Dan
__________________
Dan Wilson, STK3171, K/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland, Tn
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Keep in mind once you add PRO to the class you will increase costs by 10 fold. I know you guys have great R&D programs but when you put a staff of several brilliant racing teams on it they will find stuff that will cost everyone money to keep up...
Scott |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland, Tn
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
why not net the P/S cars keep from the back of the block all the same as now. Then let them have a certain cubic inch, accepted block, factory heads no billet pieces and a power adder that is the same for everyone. I know John Mihovetz goes 5s with a lot of factory pieces..
http://www.enginelabs.com/features/c...john-mihovetz/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|