HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2010, 02:22 PM   #101
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,646
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,747 Times in 2,235 Posts
Default Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

1967 Shelby; look at all the parts that had to given to the the 428 to make it competive.
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2010, 02:24 PM   #102
FINESPLINE
Senior Member
 
FINESPLINE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Island of high taxes, N.Y.
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

Quote:
Originally Posted by danny waters sr View Post
That would have been a cool job to have . Just think of all the muscle cars i could have driven,that i did not get to own. Love to have my old cars back in this day now. 67 440 GTX, 70 440 cuda , 70 SS chevelle 454 , 67 camaro 396 4- speed ,68 mustang GT 390 4-speed , and plenty more ........ this could be another topic.
Danny, If you wanted to know what it was like ---read the book by Joe Oldham----------Muscle Car Confidential, Confessions of a muscle car test driver. Great book about test drives and magazine articles.----John
FINESPLINE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2010, 02:31 PM   #103
Paul Ceasrine
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

Jeff,
I know a little about the big-blocks.
I had an original 1969 M-Code 440 Cuda w/3.55 gears.
You had to walk-it-out off the line, until I changed the rear..
Drum brakes, manual steering, drove like a truck.
Winding roads was not its specialty, but in a straight-line.
Thought maybe the E-Body would hook up better, with a little more mass-weight. Never had an E-Body Mopar, only A-Body cars.
From what I hear, the engine compartments are a little bigger
Sounds like you knew had to tweek the ignition.
Paul
Paul Ceasrine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2010, 04:13 PM   #104
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

I had a '68 Formula S (actually had two) that had a transplant 440 with the manual steering and brakes like your M code car. This was a 4-speed though. It had factory exhaust, an Offy intake w/ a Holley 800 DP and a .484" Purple Shaft (dang, remember when Purple Shaft cams were the hot thing? .474" Hemi grind, .484", .509" hydraulics then the .528", .557" and the ultimate was the .590" flat tappets). The Barracuda had a 4-speed and a Vertical-gate shifter with a metallic puck disck and there were 3.23's in the 8 3/4.
You couldn't slip the clutch off the line like you would in normal street driving. You almost had to pop the clutch at above idle and let it roll out. But if you tried to engage it slowly, the back of the car would shake so badly it sounded like you were going to pop the back window out!
Never took that car to the track but I have no doubt today that it would have gone 110 or so. Oh, and it was painted with fogged in accents like a SS/A 'Cuda of the time. Yea, kinda dorky...
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2010, 11:11 AM   #105
Paul Ceasrine
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

Jeff,
Yes, Purple-Shaft through .DIRECT> Everyone had to have them.
Actually a pretty decent street/strip camshaft, even with
stock valve springs. That cam or the Street Hemi grind cam should have been a standard camshaft for the 383 Road Runners and 440 Six-Pack engines.
A 4-speed and 440 in the A-Body, the rumble from the back-end must have sounded like a John Bonham drum solo.
Thats why Mopar didn't put 4-speeds in the 69' M-Code cars.
Paul

.
Paul Ceasrine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2010, 11:30 AM   #106
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs down Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Ceasrine View Post
Jeff,
Yes, Purple-Shaft through .DIRECT> Everyone had to have them.
Actually a pretty decent street/strip camshaft, even with
stock valve springs. That cam or the Street Hemi grind cam should have been a standard camshaft for the 383 Road Runners and 440 Six-Pack engines.
A 4-speed and 440 in the A-Body, the rumble from the back-end must have sounded like a John Bonham drum solo.
Thats why Mopar didn't put 4-speeds in the 69' M-Code cars.
Paul

.
I got the "Purple Shaft" right up the ole wazoo when I joined the Army back in 1966.......lol.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2010, 02:09 PM   #107
Paul Ceasrine
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: Most Under-Performing Musclecar Ever Produced?

X-Tech Man,
If memory serves correct, that would be under LBJ.
And a made-up story by McNamara
'winning over the hearts and minds of the enemy'
Hopefully that was a 3/4 cam, and not a full-race.
Remember those, 3/4 cams.
Loved it when guys came into my fathers shop and said they wanted
to put in a 3/4 cam, my father would laugh, and ask them just where do you want me to cut the cam.
Paul
Paul Ceasrine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.