|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
|
![]()
Was just looking at the new NHRA 2020 Rule Book amendment prohibiting spacers between the intake and the cylinder head.
They already allow sheet metal intakes and also two piece intake manifolds split in the middle in the class so what is the difference in having a spacer between the intake and cylinder head? This will effect many cars including Mopar 383 with Chevy intakes, Ford FE with 351C intakes and AMC with Mopar intakes running spacers to fit these intakes. Last edited by SSDiv6; 12-04-2019 at 11:06 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 153
Likes: 70
Liked 388 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
This has more to do with heads than intake manifolds.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Bay City Texas
Posts: 388
Likes: 2
Liked 225 Times in 136 Posts
|
![]()
This will effect many cars including Mopar 383 with Chevy intakes, Ford FE with 351C intakes and AMC with Mopar intakes running spacers to fit these intakes.
You mean adapters? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
Posts: 898
Likes: 604
Liked 431 Times in 224 Posts
|
![]()
I don't see anything prohibiting an extremely thick, metallic-core intake gasket.
__________________
S/ST 51 S/C 53 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Western PA
Posts: 455
Likes: 13
Liked 274 Times in 143 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
An MLS Head gasket is essentially a spacer with a gasket on each side when you get into the thicker gaskets (.050"+). How is a "metallic-core" intake gasket any different? Last edited by Steve Stasko; 12-05-2019 at 11:34 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
Posts: 898
Likes: 604
Liked 431 Times in 224 Posts
|
![]()
It was a joke, a-la "that isn't a spacer, Mr. Tech Guy. It's just a gasket with a very thick aluminum core."
__________________
S/ST 51 S/C 53 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 458
Likes: 166
Liked 124 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]()
This has more to do with lazy engine "assemblers" than anything!
__________________
Sean Cour T6066 ladle |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 819
Likes: 131
Liked 478 Times in 80 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cleves, OH
Posts: 141
Likes: 318
Liked 85 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
It seems clearly apparent who NHRA is focused on with this arbitrary change to one of the longest standing tenants of Super Stock eliminator racing. "Any intake manifold permitted provided unit is of the same configuration as original for carburetor used and will fit under original factory-produced, installed hood" has been one of the basic corner stones of Super Stock Rules since inception of the eliminator, dating to the early/mid-1970's. I'm just guessing but my money says they (NHRA) will expect the affected racers to be grateful that they "only" decided to make this change after almost 48 years of careful consideration.
Last edited by Dallas Kelly; 12-05-2019 at 05:01 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|