HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2016, 09:09 AM   #141
Fireofficer5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 89
Likes: 36
Liked 33 Times in 20 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

NMRA/NMCA run .500 pro tree handicap starts in some of their classes.
Fireofficer5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2016, 09:12 AM   #142
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

The fact is that everybody who has seriously raced under the existing rules knows that the car that leaves last has an advantage because of the red light rule. That's part of the reason that I worked to have high class cars. If you are serious about making Stock/Super Stock racing fair, then your arguments opposing Tru-Start are self-serving. Also, the current redlight rule is another minor factor that can discourage new participation. If you know that you will be at a disadvantage racing a car that you can afford, you won't race. It's like being invited to a poker game where the dealer will get to see your cards before he bets.


The only reason the current rule was created was that the original Chrondek timing system could not be programmed to duplicate what Tru-Start does. Then the guys with the most money and influence (usually the guys with the fast cars) have argued to keep it that way because of the build-in advantage.
__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2016, 11:14 AM   #143
MR DERBY CITY
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,641
Likes: 1,083
Liked 7,944 Times in 1,521 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

So glad that most of you guys weren't racing in the 60's......With your mind set we would still be using a FLAGMAN.......
MR DERBY CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2016, 11:59 AM   #144
Don Kennedy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 902 Times in 237 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Morris View Post
Bobby,
One of the fundamentals of drag racing is that you can not leave on a red light and therefore gain an advantage on your opponent. If you do, you've broken one of the basic rules in drag racing. In NHRA class racing you have committed a foul start that results in an immediate DQ. Your opponent at that moment is for all intents and purposes making a single run and is not subject to rules on redlights and breakouts. (I know you know all this)


Under the T-S system in a handicap race, if the slower car redlights he is NOT immediately DQd and can in fact win that round if the faster car redlights by a greater amount. In the case where the slower car goes on green and the faster car redlights, the faster car IS automatically DQd. If fairness is being sought using the T-S system, why does the slower car, in the last instance, get a second chance to win the round and the faster car doesn't (he's immediately DQd)? Sounds like the for-sure DQ is shifted to the faster car in a handicap race.


I'm not unloading on Bobby, it was just a place to get started.
I am against the tru start
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS
Don Kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2016, 12:14 PM   #145
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Only way I can see negating advantages for either is both cars leave at the same time and essentially run their own race. No more finish line tactics...best package wins and a red-light loses. Heads up there would be no change.
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2016, 12:19 PM   #146
Carguy49
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fife, Washington
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 2,476
Liked 2,951 Times in 709 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Dave Noll. I saw that Jody commented on his feelings about Tru-Start. I hope that Bob Gullett will chime in also. He and Charlene are probably getting settled in after their long trip from Pomona.

I have a question that might effect this thread. Out of the thousands? of rounds of racing each year, how many would be effected by Tru-Start??

I know some may say that my opinion doesn't count since I don't race anymore. I am still quite involved in the sport and help with the combo races at Pacific Raceways each year, so am good friends with many of the local stock and super stock racers. I have also met and talked with many from Div. 7.
__________________
Ron McDowell - Did Race
Every day is a Gift - Enjoy with family and friends.
Carguy49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2016, 12:35 PM   #147
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Morris View Post
Under the T-S system in a handicap race, if the slower car redlights he is NOT immediately DQd and can in fact win that round if the faster car redlights by a greater amount. In the case where the slower car goes on green and the faster car redlights, the faster car IS automatically DQd. If fairness is being sought using the T-S system, why does the slower car, in the last instance, get a second chance to win the round and the faster car doesn't (he's immediately DQd)? Sounds like the for-sure DQ is shifted to the faster car in a handicap race.
Not sure I follow the logic. The slower car does not get a second chance to win. Why is the slower car immediately disqualified when the faster car hasn't done anything? Both drivers should be judged on their individual performance, but in the current redlight rule, the driver of the faster car never gets judged if the driver of the slower car redlights.


I used to shoot pistols competitively. If I missed the mark on my trial, my opponent does not automatically win until he submits his performance. If he misses more than I do, then I win. What's the difference?
__________________

Last edited by Dwight Southerland; 11-19-2016 at 12:38 PM.
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2016, 01:21 PM   #148
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Lightbulb Re: A case for Tru-Start

I played checkers back then the first loser LOST!
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2016, 01:51 PM   #149
HR9121
Live Reporter
 
HR9121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 146
Liked 3,363 Times in 731 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carguy49 View Post
Dave Noll. I saw that Jody commented on his feelings about Tru-Start. I hope that Bob Gullett will chime in also. He and Charlene are probably getting settled in after their long trip from Pomona.

I have a question that might effect this thread. Out of the thousands? of rounds of racing each year, how many would be effected by Tru-Start??

I know some may say that my opinion doesn't count since I don't race anymore. I am still quite involved in the sport and help with the combo races at Pacific Raceways each year, so am good friends with many of the local stock and super stock racers. I have also met and talked with many from Div. 7.
I would have a guess and say less than 1%. If you looked at the numbers they might even be misconstrued, if I leave early and had an opponent dialed really fast they might see the win light and leave early to keep from sitting there banging on the 2-step.
__________________
James Williamson
W200 J/SA. SS/JA
HR9121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2016, 02:16 PM   #150
Mile High
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: My RV
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smile Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Morris View Post
Bobby,



Under the T-S system in a handicap race, if the slower car redlights he is NOT immediately DQd and can in fact win that round if the faster car redlights by a greater amount. In the case where the slower car goes on green and the faster car redlights, the faster car IS automatically DQd. If fairness is being sought using the T-S system, why does the slower car, in the last instance, get a second chance to win the round and the faster car doesn't (he's immediately DQd)? Sounds like the for-sure DQ is shifted to the faster car in a handicap race.
Using your line of reasoning the fast car's first chance to win is if the slow car goes red or not. Which is the same as the fast car, does he go red or not. Both cars get the same chance to win. One does not get more chances than the other at the starting line with TruStart.

With many tracks getting TruStart (I've heard 30+) you can bet NHRA won't be far behind.

Jeff
__________________
Street legal 64 Falcon Sprint with 410W living in Texas.
Stock - Super Stock fan
Mile High is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.