HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2008, 12:04 AM   #11
Chris Hill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 655
Likes: 8
Liked 244 Times in 26 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

All we're asking for is be smart about when you go fast, you're not the only one who runs the 70-71 B-body six pac.

Going too fast in qualfying is just plain silly. Add weight, change the shift point, disconnect the vaccum to the secondaries, just do something.

The magic number is -1.15 under or 10.40 in B/SA and 10.15 in A/SA. Try to run slower than those numbers unless you absolutly have to.
__________________
Chris Hill
https://ihmusedparts.com
Chris Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 12:05 AM   #12
Real Racer
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

I wonder who asked for a HP reduction on the 86 Chevy V-6 pick me up truck? Like it needs one?
Real Racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 11:25 AM   #13
GENE BUELL
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hesperia, Ca.
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Exclamation Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Thumbs up to the guys who actually run their cars down the track like the race cars they are.

The AHFS is not fair for the combo's with small car #'s, period. It's NHRA's ignorance to "award" HP on different body types with same engines yet throw you in with others when they want to. You all know it's the owner/drivers ability to make the car go down the track, not the body type, the $$ (it helps) or East or West of the Rockys.

You seen what the 396 guys did for their combo, make some calls, play some games. Works out as long as you have enough cars in the combo and races to go to. Stock racing is not just racing anymore with a "performance based race car" but how to play a game.

Keep your eye on the "six pack" hit, I don't think it said "B body only", and if it did, well, NHRA could lump all the six packs together as they have for other combos.

If everyone would just remember why they race S/SS, performance, flat out drag racing, and run their cars like a "real" race car not a reality game show maybe NHRA could do away with AHFS and support the racers like years ago.

Just how many of you like to see guys "lifting", it sucks to be there and see that, might as well be a ".90"class. I remember when everyone actually ran them out the door, now it's the "class" in class racing thats gone out the door.
__________________
Gene Buell 7426 STK
Gone Jeepin'!
GENE BUELL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 11:27 AM   #14
John Mason
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thumbs up Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Scott,
In the interest of fairness, please add 300 lbs to your car, disconnect the end carbs and take out 25 degrees of timing to slow your car down to the level of those who are complaining about your obvious advantage.
You should be ashamed of going fast!
John
P.S.
Rich,
Modified cars get the index for the class hit, not individual combos.
__________________
John Mason 7743 SS
John Mason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 01:47 PM   #15
RPinoski1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PLACERVILLE, CA
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

THANK YOU JOHN

By the way did you find the problem with your engine?

Thanks Again
Rich
RPinoski1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 02:13 PM   #16
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,111
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,814 Times in 413 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by GENE BUELL View Post
Thumbs up to the guys who actually run their cars down the track like the race cars they are.

The AHFS is not fair for the combo's with small car #'s, period. It's NHRA's ignorance to "award" HP on different body types with same engines yet throw you in with others when they want to. You all know it's the owner/drivers ability to make the car go down the track, not the body type, the $$ (it helps) or East or West of the Rockys.

You seen what the 396 guys did for their combo, make some calls, play some games. Works out as long as you have enough cars in the combo and races to go to. Stock racing is not just racing anymore with a "performance based race car" but how to play a game.

Keep your eye on the "six pack" hit, I don't think it said "B body only", and if it did, well, NHRA could lump all the six packs together as they have for other combos.

If everyone would just remember why they race S/SS, performance, flat out drag racing, and run their cars like a "real" race car not a reality game show maybe NHRA could do away with AHFS and support the racers like years ago.

Just how many of you like to see guys "lifting", it sucks to be there and see that, might as well be a ".90"class. I remember when everyone actually ran them out the door, now it's the "class" in class racing thats gone out the door.
Actually, the FEWER cars there are running a certain combination, the EASIER it is to keep it under control. Look to see who DID NOT get hit among the fast cars to see this is true. The iron head 396 ALMOST got hit, and the more popular aluminum head 396 DID get hit. There are a LOT more 396 cars than there are Shelby Mustangs, the only Shelby that got hit this year ran more than 1.4 under. That's ONE example, showing that the Shelby guys have an easier time protecting their combination for the most part. They've been smart, and done a good job of protecting their combination.

The number one most obvious and fatal flaw in the AHFS is that some of the softest combinations that have small car counts never get hit despite actually being faster than more popular combinations with a higher car count that do get hit.

There is no way to do away with the AHFS with the current make up of Stock and Super Stock, and you sure as Hell don't want to replace it with a bunch of people, because you are not going to find enough honest people representing a broad enough cross section of the classes to give fair representation to everyone.

Racing has always been a game, and the really fast guys don't show you what they have on every pass, they never have. Sandbagging will NEVER leave class racing.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 02:40 PM   #17
Bruce Noland
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

I agree with Alan.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK
Bruce Noland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 04:26 PM   #18
Scott Loge
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Livermore,Ca
Posts: 334
Likes: 15
Liked 145 Times in 32 Posts
Cool Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Gene,
We agree 100%!!

Mr. Mason,

I guess the hours in the garage or the $ weve spent were not in the right place. We do and have raced a long time a psychiatrist or brake specialist might have been a better investment.

Mr. Hill,

I was done but decided I would share the facts. 3rd rd at a national event when yoiu've been driving fairly well I would think you would give it everything you had, We DID!! Wesley was .002 or 5 and Chad was .031. Sixty foots and 660 were in favor of Chad by 3 hundredths. Damn close in my book so Chad lifted at about 1,100 when Wesley started goin away but mind you goin away was never more than a wheel. Pomona was a mistake and we knew it. We did not expect the car to run that fast and had made several changes that should have kept it from doing so but instead we may have found a few things that we did not expect.

To the best of my knowledge these are the facts, if you would like at anytime we could discuss this further.


Thank you!!
Scott Loge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 05:51 PM   #19
GENE BUELL
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hesperia, Ca.
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
Actually, the FEWER cars there are running a certain combination, the EASIER it is to keep it under control. Look to see who DID NOT get hit among the fast cars to see this is true. The iron head 396 ALMOST got hit, and the more popular aluminum head 396 DID get hit. There are a LOT more 396 cars than there are Shelby Mustangs, the only Shelby that got hit this year ran more than 1.4 under. That's ONE example, showing that the Shelby guys have an easier time protecting their combination for the most part. They've been smart, and done a good job of protecting their combination.

The number one most obvious and fatal flaw in the AHFS is that some of the softest combinations that have small car counts never get hit despite actually being faster than more popular combinations with a higher car count that do get hit.

There is no way to do away with the AHFS with the current make up of Stock and Super Stock, and you sure as Hell don't want to replace it with a bunch of people, because you are not going to find enough honest people representing a broad enough cross section of the classes to give fair representation to everyone.

Racing has always been a game, and the really fast guys don't show you what they have on every pass, they never have. Sandbagging will NEVER leave class racing.
Well, some people never seem to figure out how to make a car "run", so they favor "games", I guess that's so they can have a chance. It's not the "class" racing I respected and always wanted to be a part of anymore. Why should you have to go slower than your car is capable of on the race track? If your scared of speed and ET, try a lower class, don't lift.

If you look at the races and parts of the country they are run in you will see for the average guy in a low car count combo it's impossible to "save" your combo, fast runs happen, and you can't take them back.
__________________
Gene Buell 7426 STK
Gone Jeepin'!
GENE BUELL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 06:15 PM   #20
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

I have one question? Is there anyone that can not run the index, due to the horsepower hit? You might lose an advantage in class, But these cars can still go fast enough to win an event.
This IS a performance based eliminator.
I think the AHFS is a good idea, BUT they should tear cars down for the automatic stuff. And they should altitude correct all runs, including altitude factored tracks.
I remember the "GOOD OLD DAYS" when the OUIJA (pronouned WE-GEE) BOARD or the DART BOARD were the main source of the fickle finger of factor.I remember engines getting horsepower when there were 2 or 3 faster combos in the same class. Just because they were'nt politically correct.
And I'm not being a crybaby because the combo we ran never got factored.
I think you will see more guys quitting because of sandbagging than the economy. What fun is it to run to 1000 ft and shut down or run 300 pounds heavy.
This is supossed to be racing not coordinated swimming
This is why I'll never go back to a horsepower oriented class. If my index gets hit everyone in the class has to work harder.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.