HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2007, 10:36 PM   #11
Greg Gay
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
Posts: 385
Likes: 21
Liked 283 Times in 70 Posts
Default

RJ,

The 70 and 71 high compression 340's have a 2.02 intake valve. The 72 and 73 low compression 340's have a 1.88 intake valve. I am assuming heads with the 2.02 valve can flow substantially more air than the 1.88 with S/S style porting.

Charlie Walc ran one of the high compression 340's in S/S years ago. He said it was a fun car, but an expensive one.

Greg Gay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2007, 12:58 AM   #12
Paul Precht
Senior Member
 
Paul Precht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 733
Likes: 359
Liked 327 Times in 121 Posts
Default

Hi Stewart, I'm not sure if the 67 383 AFB has the weights in the rear or not. I have flowed the one without the weights and it was 565 cfm. The AVS is 635 and the 70 Holley is 645. These are clean stock carbs I had laying around, The numbers are rounded to the nearest 5. If the intake will be custom made the Stage V head which is similar to the 346 and 452 would be the best bet. If you use a store bought mani the 906 head can be an advantage. I would stay away from the 67. Paul.

Paul Precht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2007, 06:17 AM   #13
RJ
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
RJ,

The 70 and 71 high compression 340's have a 2.02 intake valve. The 72 and 73 low compression 340's have a 1.88 intake valve. I am assuming heads with the 2.02 valve can flow substantially more air than the 1.88 with S/S style porting.

Charlie Walc ran one of the high compression 340's in S/S years ago. He said it was a fun car, but an expensive one.
Greg, for some reason NHRA says the 2.020" intake head requires the same intake port volume as the 1.880" valved heads, so I don't know there is much there once you sink the valve/fill in the floor. The piston is the only other difference, and I can get a piston weight at or below what the low compression 340's currently run.

RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2007, 08:58 PM   #14
George Mirza
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North Attleborough Ma.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Hey Paulie,
Sam Dillow is looking to contact you. Send me a message with a number he can reach you at.
Gmirza1236@aol.com

__________________
GEORGE MIRZA STK 1236
George Mirza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2007, 09:57 PM   #15
Greg Gay
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
Posts: 385
Likes: 21
Liked 283 Times in 70 Posts
Default

RJ, you may be right. The port volume may be restrictive enough that the bigger valve makes no difference. I understand that the area closest to the valve is the most important, and as you move back upstream, it has less effect. I certainly have no first-hand experience doing any port work. Perhaps Paulie, who has been posting on this thread, might have some ideas.

RJ, do you run a late model GTO? If so, how fast is it, and what modifications have you made to it?


Greg Gay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2007, 12:34 AM   #16
RJ
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default




RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2007, 01:36 AM   #17
davyjones
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ALTA LOMA , CA
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I am not a mopar guy at all ... but it seems that wayne taylor , ken etter, Bob mazzolini have had pretty fast cars with the 318. i have no clue what year or car that combo is from .

davyjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2007, 02:15 AM   #18
RJ
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Greg, e-mail me - carolinaperf@yahoo.com
RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2007, 08:57 AM   #19
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
Default

The '70 Holley on the Road Runner/Super Bee engine (335hp) flows considerably more than 645 cfm. The primaries are 1.562" (same as a 600 cfm carb) and the secondaries are 1.750" (same as an 850 cfm carb). I had one on my flow bench recently and it was well over 700 cfm.

__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 12:34 AM   #20
roadrunnerrunner
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Stewart, you may want to contact Jim Fitzpatrick in Orlando.He does a fair amount of heads ..all Mopar I think.He seems to be very knowledgeable and alwaya willing to help.

roadrunnerrunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.