Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... - Page 2

RJ Sledge · 04-07-2009, 11:21 AM

Bill, they originally had Schneider C-4's in them, Rusty Hall had a problem @ Arizona Nationals. They now have JPT (Jim Pacquet) C-4's in them and are performing a lot better, i.e. 9.79 @ 140.17 at Dallas. They did break a imput shaft and I checked out the C-4 and loaned them another one (imput shaft). They are so quite you would think they had mufflers, but they don't. And they do get down the track very quickly.

R J Sledge

Bob Pagano · 04-07-2009, 11:22 AM

I am sorry but I dont think I would want to lock the brakes at 140 120s is hard enough in a Stocker, I really dont envy them.

bill dedman · 04-07-2009, 12:19 PM

Thanks for the info, RJ. I wasn't aware of the change in tranny guys. Sorry for the mis-information; Len's stuff is usually top-flight.

I guess when you start putting 700+ horsepower through a transmission designed for a Pinto, (LOL!) you can expect that it might have longivity problems....

Bruce Noland · 04-07-2009, 12:23 PM

Bob,
Can you womp, womp, womp an injected supercharged car?

140 mph from the off-the-shelf CJs. The tricked out, down to weight CJs will be running 145 mph.

Jeff Lee · 04-07-2009, 01:00 PM

What was my prediction? 9.45 @ 143 by the end of the season? Bruce, I couldn't find the post. Can you?
143 should be a 9.29 so I'm allowing for some inefficency.
Mainly because they can afford to be sloppy.
The Challengers will push the CJ's to let it all hang out.

Bruce Noland · 04-07-2009, 01:46 PM

Jeff,

I made a similar prediction during the Factory Experimental thread. And I remember your prediction as well. Do you remember which thread it was in? That would help. I think you can go into your own account information and retreive that post/information.

Bob Pagano · 04-07-2009, 02:02 PM

Bruce, I stopped my project over a year ago, it may never be finished. I guessed it was going to be a joke with the CJs coming, now even the Mopar looks like another joke.

Superfan1 · 04-07-2009, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bill dedman

Thanks for the info, RJ. I wasn't aware of the change in tranny guys. Sorry for the mis-information; Len's stuff is usually top-flight.

I guess when you start putting 700+ horsepower through a transmission designed for a Pinto, (LOL!) you can expect that it might have longivity problems....

Bill, when you started this thread , you stated that you used a weight of 3358 lbs. for your HP calculations. In another thread on this forum, titled "More enhancement", someone, who claimed to have been there when the car in question driven by Jimmy Holzman went across the scales, states that the weight was 3485 lbs. Try plugging that into your calculator; 127 additional lbs. should make a significant difference.
Bill Seabrooks - superfan1
Bridgeport, Ct.

rtaylor3410 · 04-07-2009, 02:37 PM

Gentleman, I think NHRA will change Stock Eliminator to 1970 and newer vehicles before they move these Mustangs out of Stock!

John Kelley · 04-07-2009, 02:50 PM

I used an online calculator to run the numbers....
Weight 3485#
ET------- 9.79
MPH---- 140
It came out ....Rear Wheel HP....660.67
..........................Flywheel HP....734.08
The online calculator I used was http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculators.htm

04-07-2009, 11:21 AM	#11
RJ Sledge Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 789 Likes: 504 Liked 288 Times in 90 Posts	Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... Bill, they originally had Schneider C-4's in them, Rusty Hall had a problem @ Arizona Nationals. They now have JPT (Jim Pacquet) C-4's in them and are performing a lot better, i.e. 9.79 @ 140.17 at Dallas. They did break a imput shaft and I checked out the C-4 and loaned them another one (imput shaft). They are so quite you would think they had mufflers, but they don't. And they do get down the track very quickly. R J Sledge

04-07-2009, 11:22 AM	#12
Bob Pagano VIP Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC Posts: 1,163 Likes: 243 Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts	Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... I am sorry but I dont think I would want to lock the brakes at 140 120s is hard enough in a Stocker, I really dont envy them. __________________ Bob Pagano A/SA

04-07-2009, 12:19 PM	#13
bill dedman VIP Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Conway, AR Posts: 1,739 Likes: 0 Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts	Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... Thanks for the info, RJ. I wasn't aware of the change in tranny guys. Sorry for the mis-information; Len's stuff is usually top-flight. I guess when you start putting 700+ horsepower through a transmission designed for a Pinto, (LOL!) you can expect that it might have longivity problems.... __________________ Bill Last edited by bill dedman; 04-07-2009 at 12:22 PM.

04-07-2009, 12:23 PM	#14
Bruce Noland VIP Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 1,855 Likes: 83 Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts	Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... Bob, Can you womp, womp, womp an injected supercharged car? 140 mph from the off-the-shelf CJs. The tricked out, down to weight CJs will be running 145 mph. __________________ Bruce Noland 1788 STK

04-07-2009, 01:00 PM	#15
Jeff Lee VIP Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Anthem, Arizona Posts: 2,766 Likes: 0 Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts	Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... What was my prediction? 9.45 @ 143 by the end of the season? Bruce, I couldn't find the post. Can you? 143 should be a 9.29 so I'm allowing for some inefficency. Mainly because they can afford to be sloppy. The Challengers will push the CJ's to let it all hang out. __________________ Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX

04-07-2009, 01:46 PM	#16
Bruce Noland VIP Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 1,855 Likes: 83 Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts	Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... Jeff, I made a similar prediction during the Factory Experimental thread. And I remember your prediction as well. Do you remember which thread it was in? That would help. I think you can go into your own account information and retreive that post/information. __________________ Bruce Noland 1788 STK

04-07-2009, 02:02 PM	#17
Bob Pagano VIP Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC Posts: 1,163 Likes: 243 Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts	Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... Bruce, I stopped my project over a year ago, it may never be finished. I guessed it was going to be a joke with the CJs coming, now even the Mopar looks like another joke. __________________ Bob Pagano A/SA

04-07-2009, 02:37 PM	#19
rtaylor3410 Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 30 Likes: 70 Liked 3 Times in 1 Post	Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... Gentleman, I think NHRA will change Stock Eliminator to 1970 and newer vehicles before they move these Mustangs out of Stock!

04-07-2009, 02:50 PM	#20
John Kelley Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Tightwad,TEXAS Posts: 911 Likes: 6 Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts	Re: Blown, injected, 4-valve CJ's at Ennis... I used an online calculator to run the numbers.... Weight 3485# ET------- 9.79 MPH---- 140 It came out ....Rear Wheel HP....660.67 ..........................Flywheel HP....734.08 The online calculator I used was http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculators.htm