HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2009, 08:13 PM   #11
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Corvette Stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by S/ST4707 View Post
Thanks for the input and suggestions. I really am looking at the Corvette due to engine setback. The only drawback I see is the use of a transverse spring with a solid rear and short trailing arms.
shoot me an private message and I will try and help you out with the IRS, and I can also recommend someone to do the straight axle conversion if thats the route you want to go.
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 08:26 PM   #12
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Corvette Stocker

I recall the issues with the IRS Corvette rears a little. When Bernie Agamen built his Corvette he was given an ok to use a std solid rear axle. When he showed up at the racetrack the story changed and he had to change it back to the IRS type rear. He broke that thing numerous times as I recall. Now that was a big tire car and a 454 but they were not all that fast back then compared to today's stockers. I was pitted next to Muni Haddad at Maple Grove one year and they were workjing on the rear of their Corvette. I was wrestling with my own issues but on his next run Haddad crashed that car badly and went up and maybe over the guardrail. I heard it was a half shaft failure......I'd be hesitat to race one if it had a BB without using the solid rear...


Personnaly I'd run the 350/300...Cam is pretty small but hey scads of guys run that cam and go fast with low compression 350's...Same cam.....Those cars are nice and make very nice racecars. There is a '68 327 for sale on this site I think.....Real nice loooking car.....
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R

Last edited by Rich Biebel; 08-08-2009 at 08:34 PM.
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 08:59 PM   #13
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Corvette Stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes View Post
I beg to differ on that. A properly set up Swing Axle will live behind a big block just fine. Greg Eaton runs mid to high 8's on a Tom's differential IRS. You do have to know what you are doing but the Tom's stuff is 100% reliable in a stocker. Its also an advantage on a marginal race track.
I had the "TOMS" complete swing axle also known as Henerys stuff. I got all of mine from Leon Maranian when he went to S/S and a dana rear. It is really strong but your not supposed to run a spool...Just a posi unit with a swing arm assembly (NHRA rules) though some do run a spool. Several have ended up in the wall because of using a spool instead of a posi (Muni Haddad for one???) when a half shaft or U joint breaks look out.. Your on borrowed time with a high HP big block. Its up to you. If i was going with the small block I would stay with the swing axle. I ran mine for 3 years with a small block and a 4 speed (7 inch tire days) with out a failure but as soon as we went to the S/S rules of 1972 (larger rear tires) I ran into breakage. One tip....align the rear with 1/8th degree Positive camber with the swing axle and use a heavy rated (pound) transverse spring.

Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 08-08-2009 at 09:14 PM.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 10:33 PM   #14
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Corvette Stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN View Post
I had the "TOMS" complete swing axle also known as Henerys stuff. I got all of mine from Leon Maranian when he went to S/S and a dana rear. It is really strong but your not supposed to run a spool...Just a posi unit with a swing arm assembly (NHRA rules) though some do run a spool. Several have ended up in the wall because of using a spool instead of a posi (Muni Haddad for one???) when a half shaft or U joint breaks look out.. Your on borrowed time with a high HP big block. Its up to you. If i was going with the small block I would stay with the swing axle. I ran mine for 3 years with a small block and a 4 speed (7 inch tire days) with out a failure but as soon as we went to the S/S rules of 1972 (larger rear tires) I ran into breakage. One tip....align the rear with 1/8th degree Positive camber with the swing axle and use a heavy rated (pound) transverse spring.
Well dad's been racing IRS vettes since 1970, and we have had zero failures since we went to the Tom's stuff. I also know Leon pretty well. If you really study the forces and physics behind these rear ends its not a big issue. The Tom's 1480 stuff is damn near bulletproof if you follow a few rules. Hint: the car shouldn't "squat".

Oh and about the spool issue. ANY car would do that if it broke an axle with a spool. The big issue is the outer axle and the Henry's/Tom's/Peppy's/etc solved that. Regular maintenance, and some good knowledge of geometry and physics goes a long way on these cars.
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2009, 04:21 PM   #15
S/ST4707
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Corvette Stocker

Guys, Now have finally decided to build a car I will go to a solid rear end. Chad, I will PM you to find out who you recommend for the solid rear end. Thanks for the input.
S/ST4707 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 03:55 PM   #16
mopar68
VIP Member
 
mopar68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 8
Liked 44 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Corvette Stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee View Post
I don't know about competitive but I'd build a '68 L88. Stick only. Real mans car!
Ditto!

M68
mopar68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 04:05 PM   #17
Bob Bender
VIP Member
 
Bob Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 1,599
Liked 459 Times in 90 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Corvette Stocker

[quote=Rich Biebel;134033]I recall the issues with the IRS Corvette rears a little. When Bernie Agamen built his Corvette he was given an ok to use a std solid rear axle. When he showed up at the racetrack the story changed and he had to change it back to the IRS type rear. He broke that thing numerous times as I recall. Now that was a big tire car and a 454 but they were not all that fast back then compared to today's stockers. I was pitted next to Muni Haddad at Maple Grove one year and they were workjing on the rear of their Corvette. I was wrestling with my own issues but on his next run Haddad crashed that car badly and went up and maybe over the guardrail. I heard it was a half shaft failure......I'd be hesitat to race one if it had a BB without using the solid rear...

The half shift broke in the lights............he went a long way on his top......but he was "OK"..........
__________________
Bob Bender 144 O/SA
2010-2012 National Record Holder
Bob Bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 04:25 PM   #18
KEN BUGAJ
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LEXINGTON NC.
Posts: 389
Likes: 43
Liked 18 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Corvette Stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes View Post
I beg to differ on that. A properly set up Swing Axle will live behind a big block just fine. Greg Eaton runs mid to high 8's on a Tom's differential IRS. You do have to know what you are doing but the Tom's stuff is 100% reliable in a stocker. Its also an advantage on a marginal race track.
Tom's stuff would be the way to go.
You'll never get the 427/400 3X2 to run with the Camaro's
The 390 Hp has a problem with the intake, It's junk.
If I were to do another Corvette it would be with Tom's stuff and the L-88 Automatic,
We ran SS corvettes year's ago with Tom's stuff, It held up to 700 hp plus.
Why put the solid rear in a Corvette and make it like a Camaro.
You take the best part of the car away.
With the 502's in Top Stock Matt Morgan and I had the same HP.
He always ran the same ET but I would run a bit more speed. (I had a 12 bolt solid rear)
I have the feeling the IRS would run a bit quicker.How much, That's the question.
KEN BUGAJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 06:53 PM   #19
Bob Pagano
VIP Member
 
Bob Pagano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 241
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Corvette Stocker

I have also ran some vettes, listen to Ken, go here and read. The Toms stuff works along with the Dragvette Products link system works. You even get halfshaft loops and drive shaft loop, all quality stuff.

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/1...es_shafts.html
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA
Bob Pagano is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 07:00 PM   #20
S/ST4707
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Corvette Stocker

Thanks for sharing your experience and suggestions. I will read up on both rear end solutions.
S/ST4707 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.