HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2010, 03:13 PM   #11
Chris "drooze" Wertman
VIP Member
 
Chris "drooze" Wertman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Barberton Ohio
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 10.59 @127.67

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Hill View Post
Drooze, I think you are 100% right. This is a nine second car with the right development. I have said before this is the most bogus combination of all the new cars. If you get satisfaction from running a car that is in the wrong class [should be an A or B car ], and that is probably 100 horsepower under factored go for it. I don't believe you will make a lot of friends doing this. Just because you can do this doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.
Fast cars do not make winners in Stock Elim, I know that, I like fast.....BUT I also like consistent.

Were driving the car now, our other driver had commitments.

As far as making friends, I have made a ton, and I hope to make more, if I kill someone in a heads up from a speed standpoint (and dont go red) I can see someone getting upset, but have you seen me drive ? I dont think its a fear many others who have seen me drive will have
__________________
Chris "Drooze" Wertman 3132 (F/SA 2009 Challenger Drag Pak #24 with a best of 10.59)
Chris "drooze" Wertman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 03:33 PM   #12
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 751
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: 10.59 @127.67

Is it even legal to run a actual 2009 challenger? I mean if I went to the lot and bought one and wanted to run the engine that came in the car with the injection system that came on the car is it in the book? Or are only the bogus combos legal?
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 03:46 PM   #13
Chris "drooze" Wertman
VIP Member
 
Chris "drooze" Wertman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Barberton Ohio
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 10.59 @127.67

Quote:
Originally Posted by novassdude View Post
Is it even legal to run a actual 2009 challenger? I mean if I went to the lot and bought one and wanted to run the engine that came in the car with the injection system that came on the car is it in the book? Or are only the bogus combos legal?
Unfortunatey NOT, I dont know why, It bugs me , we have a 2008 SRT8 That we would like to run as well......already have the damm car.....cant run it.
__________________
Chris "Drooze" Wertman 3132 (F/SA 2009 Challenger Drag Pak #24 with a best of 10.59)
Chris "drooze" Wertman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 04:05 PM   #14
Shawn Blair
Member
 
Shawn Blair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everson, WA.
Posts: 122
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking Re: 10.59 @127.67

When the specs came out for the engines, It was plain to see that the 5.7 was the killer combo! Same heads, intake, throttle body as the 6.1 and more compression! Good for you Drooze on picking this engine. There will probably more 5.7 cars out soon but you will always be the first to go fast with one! As for all the complaining I remember when the newer camaro & firebird came out it was the end of the world for everyone that did not have one, but eventually they got factored correctly! So just go race your car and have fun that's what it's all about anyway, right?

Shawn 6383
__________________
Shawn Blair 6383 SS 634 STK
Shawn Blair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 04:11 PM   #15
Nitro Joe Jackson
VIP Member
 
Nitro Joe Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Loudonville, Ohio or where ever the Nitro Lounge is parked
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 54
Liked 67 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: 10.59 @127.67

I want to see a ET on the sheet, not a 20 lbs light 10.59 ET
__________________
Nitro Joe Jackson STK 3431
nitrojoe@neo.rr.com
Nitro Joe Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 04:26 PM   #16
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 751
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: 10.59 @127.67

The huge difference between this and the F bodys. With the F body you took a real car available at any dealership and converted it into a race car. These are 100% bogus. Show me one Challenger built for the public legal to drive on the roads that has any of these engines and injection systems.
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 04:34 PM   #17
Chris "drooze" Wertman
VIP Member
 
Chris "drooze" Wertman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Barberton Ohio
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 10.59 @127.67

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitro Joe Jackson View Post
I want to see a ET on the sheet, not a 20 lbs light 10.59 ET
YOU and ME Both Joe !
__________________
Chris "Drooze" Wertman 3132 (F/SA 2009 Challenger Drag Pak #24 with a best of 10.59)
Chris "drooze" Wertman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 04:40 PM   #18
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: 10.59 @127.67

Quote:
Originally Posted by novassdude View Post
The huge difference between this and the F bodys. With the F body you took a real car available at any dealership and converted it into a race car. These are 100% bogus. Show me one Challenger built for the public legal to drive on the roads that has any of these engines and injection systems.
I don't like it,you don't like it,a slew of people don'tlike it.NHRA likes it and the mustangs.Bottom line.If and until GM throws some ringers into the mix you all have you're new whipping boys,Drooze and Jeff.
Where are all the emails to Glendora,complaints to division directors,boycotts?Just a bunch of pi$$ing and moaning on the internet about it.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 04:50 PM   #19
herbjr
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 1
Liked 83 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: 10.59 @127.67

I think its funny they hate Drooze. Dont hate the player, hate the game.

NHRA made the rules now you hate the players. I heard he was 200 light not 20.
herbjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 04:54 PM   #20
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 25
Liked 543 Times in 212 Posts
Default Re: 10.59 @127.67

Back in the day....as the saying goes.....One of these cars would have a new class or classes made for them.... something like the FX classes

No friggen way this is a legal Stocker or Super Stocker for that matter.......They would not even be legal back in the days of liberal interpetation of the rules in the Jr Stock era......

No offense to you Chris.....as you say you did not create this car but your one run says a lot,reading between the lines on the slip and in who did it.....
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.