|
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Genoa, Illinois
Posts: 489
Likes: 9
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Ed; Do you play the Loto, also?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Nothern IL
Posts: 596
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Bill Baer 3391 SC, 339B SC, QR |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dresden On. Canada
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I prefer the Moroso screen. I have a System one sitting on the shelf collecting dust. If your collapsing filters your running too much pressure, too thick an oil, and disabled the filter bypass. I also prefer the Fram filters with the gripping surface we remove them after each day to look at the screen. With our headers you can remove the filter , move it sideways, and use a mirror [or a second set of eyes ] to look at the screen without twisting the filter out and spilling the oil all over the headers. I reuse filters about 6 times. ----Thanx Trevor
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cummaquid, Mass
Posts: 445
Likes: 413
Liked 60 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
System one is the only way to go. I've been using them for 14 years and never an issue easy to clean and monitor. I usually go 20 to 25 runs an oil change. Expensive up front but it more than pays for it self in the long run. Probably could use the Moroso screen with it also if you look at the filter daily!
__________________
Sam Murray 1616 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|