|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 2,046
Liked 2,167 Times in 504 Posts
|
![]()
?????
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 5
Liked 281 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]()
Cool video,yes they look serious,but I sure hope they "work" on the 60ft.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 233
Likes: 1,041
Liked 60 Times in 28 Posts
|
![]()
Doesn't help their cause to have "Concept Vehicle - Not Available for Sale" across the bottom of the video. They are supposedly trying to get public response to show GM brass that it's worth doing; and that's not going to encourage people to write in.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: zoo york
Posts: 572
Likes: 3
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I hope it happens. Would be awesome to see those car's at the track.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Mo-ta City
Posts: 247
Likes: 56
Liked 31 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
The chassis is just fine. First passes with a brand new car. The fly-by-wire throttle function was lazy and they'll get it worked out.
Do Challenger Drag Paks work ok? There ya go :-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: zoo york
Posts: 572
Likes: 3
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 5
Liked 281 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I'm sure they will get it worked out just fine too,but to think that was probably a 1.5 under pass I suppose? Have the HP factors officially been announced yet? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hanover, MA
Posts: 430
Likes: 3
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
235 and start out in K lol.
__________________
Doug Blackley 1697 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|