|
![]() |
#11 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 63
Liked 756 Times in 189 Posts
|
![]()
Lee - Is your dad Corky Jordan? Still have the old Wheel City Fairlane?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Buffalo New York
Posts: 78
Likes: 9
Liked 48 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
I use 1.589. Pretty close for my car.
__________________
Ronnie Kaczmarek |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 121
Liked 347 Times in 123 Posts
|
![]()
I have used the 1.8th x 1.56 for years.
I do know most (but not all) race cars achieved 75% of their total 1/4 mile mph at the 1/8th mile mark. This is the site I use most of the time: http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculators.htm
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 700
Likes: 440
Liked 170 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 121
Liked 347 Times in 123 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Those calculations are based on engine/drivetrain/suspension combos that are not totally maxed out and well tuned like yours.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 654
Likes: 8
Liked 244 Times in 26 Posts
|
![]()
Generally, the larger the ratio, the better the car et's for it's mph.
Example, if your ratio is 1.5 it does not et as well a ratio of 1.6. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 105
Likes: 187
Liked 55 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I do still have the Wheel City Fairlane. It is all fresh except for the motor. I was considering running the car some but it seems I need to do some home work. LOL!! Its good to see a bunch of names on here I remember from the days of racing. I miss this so very much. I hope to be able to race the car some maybe next year. Lee.
__________________
1967 Fairlane A/Stick - 1994 Mustang GT. 1989 Oldsmobile, R/SA - 2016 Z06 Weekend Street Car. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Green Creek (Tryon) North Carolina
Posts: 331
Likes: 69
Liked 99 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
just thinking out of the box, but you would think aerodynamics would come into play with 1/8 vs 1/4 times. In my mind if you matched up a 1955 chevy with a and new model wind slicing body style, match the cars weigh and engine, I think the wind slicer would be half a fender at the 1/8 and a fender at the 1/4. Aerodynamics should be more of a factor as speed is increased, and should the hurt the "shoebox more than the "wind slicer". Don Jackson
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,742
Likes: 2,845
Liked 5,002 Times in 1,902 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() (Bill Shurla photos)
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 09-29-2012 at 09:37 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
It looks like the crowd was into it pretty good back then.....the good ole days once again............
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|