|
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Coraopolis, Pa.
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I would stay with the 360 for two reasons...first the more cubes to get it moving the better, second and the bigger reason the 318 piston is a true flat-top (no valve reliefs) so the restricted cam duration is a big issue with the legal lift spec and that they also run the same diameter intake valve.....
D L Rambo......STK1300 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Check out Ad #181958984 on racingjunk.com Thanks Ron
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Coraopolis, Pa.
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The stock iron heads are prone to cracking so NHRA allowed the
Magnum R/T iron head as a legal replacement with a 5 hp penalty...the R/T head was discontinued so at that point NHRA approved the Edelbrock # 61767 for use instead....If money is no issue obviously the Edelbrock head is the way to go, but if it is I would try and find someone who is doing the conversion to the Edelbrock heads who has the R/T heads already and see if they would be willing to make you a deal on them..... Also any of the approved fuel injection computers will run it...... D L Rambo.......Stk 1300 Last edited by magnumv8; 11-04-2013 at 07:30 PM. Reason: more info |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|