Tru Start coming! - Page 2

Ed Wright · 07-14-2016, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Pearson

This is about the only rule that doesn't conform to the "First or Worst" scenario. Its beyond time to make the change. I am in favor.

It would be the "worst", right?

HandOverFist · 07-14-2016, 11:09 AM

I've always favored the Pro tree, no matter the type of car I was driving.

RobbieRacer · 07-14-2016, 11:22 AM

Having lost a few rounds with the better red light, I'm all for it. I lost in the final round at the Vegas Bracket Nationals. Cost me a Grand! 😀

Tom keedle · 07-14-2016, 11:49 AM

as bad as I've been redlighting, a 4 tenths tree would work for me

novassdude · 07-14-2016, 11:51 AM

There is more than one timing system be used at race tracks across the country as far as I know. And it said that true start is patented to compulink. So any track running a different system will still be running off the current rules of first red light loses. Is this correct?

Also the second this does become the rule we will have the best package argument. I can already hear it. I had a .001 red light and ran dead on I should get the win because my opponent had a .333 light and was a second over his dial in.

Lenny5160 · 07-14-2016, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by novassdude

Also the second this does become the rule we will have the best package argument. I can already hear it. I had a .001 red light and ran dead on I should get the win because my opponent had a .333 light and was a second over his dial in.

I don't see the correlation. One driver fouled, the other didn't. That shouldn't ever change.

boostedf22c · 07-14-2016, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HandOverFist

I've always favored the Pro tree, no matter the type of car I was driving.

Me too!!

I hate the "slow" tree as we call it.

Mike Pearson · 07-14-2016, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

It would be the "worst", right?

Yes Worst red light

07-14-2016, 03:52 PM

Thank you Peter and Kyle!!

tim worner · 07-14-2016, 04:09 PM

You guys that want pro start should block the first 2 out then you have a pro start tree

07-14-2016, 11:09 AM	#12
HandOverFist VIP Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Gulf Breeze, FL Posts: 1,651 Likes: 8 Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts	Re: Tru Start coming! I've always favored the Pro tree, no matter the type of car I was driving. __________________ Rich Taylor I/SA - 321

07-14-2016, 11:22 AM	#13
RobbieRacer Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Phoenix, Az Posts: 320 Likes: 17 Liked 118 Times in 41 Posts	Re: Tru Start coming! Having lost a few rounds with the better red light, I'm all for it. I lost in the final round at the Vegas Bracket Nationals. Cost me a Grand! 😀 __________________ U/SA 79 Mustang

07-14-2016, 11:49 AM	#14
Tom keedle Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh Posts: 695 Likes: 13 Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts	Re: Tru Start coming! as bad as I've been redlighting, a 4 tenths tree would work for me __________________ without losers,winning means nothing.

07-14-2016, 11:51 AM	#15
novassdude Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: usa Posts: 752 Likes: 204 Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts	Re: Tru Start coming! There is more than one timing system be used at race tracks across the country as far as I know. And it said that true start is patented to compulink. So any track running a different system will still be running off the current rules of first red light loses. Is this correct? Also the second this does become the rule we will have the best package argument. I can already hear it. I had a .001 red light and ran dead on I should get the win because my opponent had a .333 light and was a second over his dial in.

07-14-2016, 03:52 PM	#19
Barry Polley Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Tru Start coming! Thank you Peter and Kyle!!

07-14-2016, 04:09 PM	#20
tim worner Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: duncannon Posts: 837 Likes: 14 Liked 126 Times in 20 Posts	Re: Tru Start coming! You guys that want pro start should block the first 2 out then you have a pro start tree __________________ Tim Worner SS 1747