Coyote blueprint specs changed

[Jason]

"The Coyote blueprint specs have been changed."

Maybe that should say...The Coyote blueprint specs have been corrected.

Question...Was the -1.20 under car at the D-1 race torn down and checked? If not, why not?

[kdanner]

Originally Posted by Jason

"The Coyote blueprint specs have been changed."

Maybe that should say...The Coyote blueprint specs have been corrected.

Question...Was the -1.20 under car at the D-1 race torn down and checked? If not, why not?

I asked that at the time. A photo was provided of the car in the barn with the throttle body removed.

[Markeracer]

Originally Posted by kdanner

How interesting. I don't even know who you are, but that is exactly the same story I have heard somewhere else, and it was concerning exactly the car which I suspected it was.

I didn't know any stocker was allowed carbon doors either, but evidently I was wrong...

Carbon Fiber Doors AND Optic Armor polycarbonate windows. Is it a coincidence that there are only 2 CJs in the country with these lightweight parts and they run out of the same shop?

[kdanner]

I possibly have the same problem someone else did which led to these revelations. This is the piston Mahle sold me. Anyone happen to know if this is the one where the dome will hit the chamber unless it is a CNC chamber?

[SSDiv6]

Originally Posted by kdanner

I can only guess, but my best guess when I initially read this was that someone had entered as a 2014 but actually used heads with at least one of the differences in the 13 head which are:

1. CNC ports/chamber
2. Larger exhaust valve


Am I getting warm?

I believe the new approved cylinder heads are the 5.2 Coyote, GT350 cylinder heads. They are CNC ported and also have a larger valve.
They also have larger port runners.

[Jeff Stout]

The earlier heads are hard to find just like the SBC so these are the superceded heads. Nothing to look at here.

[kdanner]

Originally Posted by Jeff Stout

The earlier heads are hard to find just like the SBC so these are the superceded heads. Nothing to look at here.

That is not what this is about, at all. No new heads were added. Some were taken away that shouldn't have been there to begin with though.

[james schaechter]

Originally Posted by Whalen3186

It seems like this combination has drawn some attention since it went -1.20 and got instant hp at a D1 race last month. Maybe Mr. Carson or his spokesperson, JDM, can shed some light on the topic?

He was never for a lack of posts before. I am sure he will weigh in.....well maybe.

[HR9121]

Originally Posted by kdanner

How interesting. I don't even know who you are, but that is exactly the same story I have heard somewhere else, and it was concerning exactly the car which I suspected it was.

I didn't know any stocker was allowed carbon doors either, but evidently I was wrong...

He's the brother of Jeff Hairrington who runs this combination with the CORRECT heads and is now the one holding the bag of horsepower that the other one got running the combo with the wrong heads on it.

[MPR]

Tear downs did no good because the tech dept protected one certain racer and allowed heads, pistons and other parts which were never produced or installed by the factory. We're talking about Stock where factory produced and approved components are mandated to be used by all competitors. When bogus specs get onto a TI form the person responsible should be held accountable. Keep digging and you'll be surprised. Not everyone will spend the time to look into this because they think it doesn't affect them because it's not the brand they race but how do we know if this is an isolated case? The more you look the more surprised you'd be. Even tech officials have been told to look the other way. Heads are not rare, like mentioned that's not what this is about. There's only nothing to look at here if you choose to look the other way.